The Sycamore Gap tree held a particularly deep place in people's hearts
1–10 of 141 posts
Re: The Sycamore Gap tree held a particularly deep place in people's hearts
#2Re: The Sycamore Gap tree held a particularly deep place in people's hearts
#3Re: The Sycamore Gap tree held a particularly deep place in people's hearts
#4Re: The Sycamore Gap tree held a particularly deep place in people's hearts
#5[flagged]
Re: The Sycamore Gap tree held a particularly deep place in people's hearts
#6Re: The Sycamore Gap tree held a particularly deep place in people's hearts
#7Re: The Sycamore Gap tree held a particularly deep place in people's hearts
#8Re: The Sycamore Gap tree held a particularly deep place in people's hearts
#9Re: The Sycamore Gap tree held a particularly deep place in people's hearts
#10But nobody gives a fuck about the brutalist structures being torn down, like the VA in Chicago or the Federal Building in Boston, because they're ugly. I mean they are of significantly greater historical significance than some random dilapidated Victorian home in San Francisco. So the law protects the local community's most mobilized opinion of what's pretty and cute, not what's significant.
People's definition of meaningful or sentimental, when it relates to a past that isn't personally theirs / belonging to their family... it's a very mainstream notion of beauty or awe. It sucks for this tree, those kids should not have chopped it down, whatever, nobody needs to have that conversation. But have you personally ever given a fuck about a sentimental something outside your family that is also ugly?