Live data from Hacker News

Schools for children of military achieve results rarely seen in public education

nytimes.com

141–150 of 290 posts

Re: Schools for children of military achieve results rarely seen in public education

#141
post #77

[dead]

Steve Sailer the white supremacist? Yeah, I wouldn't trust his claims on anything related to education especially on IQ.

Ad hominem. He's making a simple claim about the world that is easily verifiable. This site has information about the testing requirements and current cutoff. [1]

1: https://www.sbe.wa.gov/our-work/graduation-pathway-options/a...

Re: Schools for children of military achieve results rarely seen in public education

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you kick out the problematic students, the only students you have left are easy to teach non-problematic students. Maybe the negative effects of having problematic students is enough that its a worthwhile endeavor? By Middle school or high school "problematic students" involves people that not only are noisy and disruptive in class, but people that deal drugs, rob people, steal, join gangs, bring weapons to scho…

Wow they sound really undesirable. I wonder if there's some place you could concentrate such people to reduce their impact? Maybe some sort of camp, idk. In all seriousness once you start thinking of huge swathes of children as a problem in this way, the "solutions" become clear and atrocious. You have to find another path sorry.

I’m happy to hear that you’ve agreed to teach them all as the alternative path. Have fun!

Re: Schools for children of military achieve results rarely seen in public education

#143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you kick out the problematic students, the only students you have left are easy to teach non-problematic students. Maybe the negative effects of having problematic students is enough that its a worthwhile endeavor? By Middle school or high school "problematic students" involves people that not only are noisy and disruptive in class, but people that deal drugs, rob people, steal, join gangs, bring weapons to scho…

Wow they sound really undesirable. I wonder if there's some place you could concentrate such people to reduce their impact? Maybe some sort of camp, idk. In all seriousness once you start thinking of huge swathes of children as a problem in this way, the "solutions" become clear and atrocious. You have to find another path sorry.

When the actual fix (improving the lives, discipline, and care provided by their parents) is untenable, other lower effort solutions start to become more attractive. It's unreasonable to expect schools to correct for a poor upbringing.

Re: Schools for children of military achieve results rarely seen in public education

#145
post #142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow they sound really undesirable. I wonder if there's some place you could concentrate such people to reduce their impact? Maybe some sort of camp, idk. In all seriousness once you start thinking of huge swathes of children as a problem in this way, the "solutions" become clear and atrocious. You have to find another path sorry.

I’m happy to hear that you’ve agreed to teach them all as the alternative path. Have fun!

It's funny you think it's preposterous that I might. Buddy we're not all sucking down six figures to write ad company spyware.

Re: Schools for children of military achieve results rarely seen in public education

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Serious question: you don't see a dilemma in kicking out those who seem problematic? I absolutely hear you that a parent wants the best for their kid. But historically declaring that some students are an issue has been a frought road.

Let’s assume there will be some % of kids that lack interest in learning, have no parental or community support, and despite schools providing them additional support for years they show no improvement or desire to improve. I think it’s reasonable some % of these people will always be in the population pool. What is the solution for these individuals?

That's quite a big assumption, but what do you think will happen if you don't offer them any education? They won't earn much or grow the economy and might end up going to prison, which is far more expensive.

Re: Schools for children of military achieve results rarely seen in public education

#147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I do think that the students who don't get accepted into the selective schools need better options. It's just when the options are keep all the students together or separate them and some will become better and some will become worse I think providing the students who want to succeed with a way to accomplish their goals is the correct choice. Hopefully there will be another option that isn't so exclusionary in the fu…

You sidestepped my point. Segregating all the underperformers into one place causes harm and you're ignoring that harm, assuming that the benefit of segregating the high performers is more important. And you are in fact crediting the charter school with the benefit while ensuring that public schools receive blame for any harm that results. I think you're actually arguing against universal instruction, that we shouldn…

Those “underperformers” aren’t being helped in either case. If we can dilute these problematic people into the general population maybe we won’t notice the pool smells distinctly like urine - aka the kiddie pool.

Education isn’t hard or expensive. Providing therapy for years of trauma and neglect is. Trying to focus on algebra when your home life is totally whack is hard. Otherwise what’s the cost of education.. chalk and plastic chairs?

Valuing public welfare is great, but so are the virtues that promote healthy families. Education is done by parents and there’s lots of adults with children who aren’t parents. Personal responsibility is a concept that will actually enrage otherwise intelligent people

Re: Schools for children of military achieve results rarely seen in public education

#148

I think this can be misleading in the same way some charter school results are. The easiest way to improve a school's results isn't to improve the education provided, it's to get rid of the worst performing kids. Charter schools do this by various selection effects, and artificial barriers, like ending at noon on a Wednesday. So the only kids who go there have two parents, one who probably is stay at home and can pic…

Education is mostly about your peers. It's obviously true for prestigious universities but it's just as true for elementary schools. Charter schools kicking out problematic students isn't some loophole, it's the main point, and it absolutely can improve the education for those that remain. My district has a quarter of high schoolers in charter schools. Almost all of them under the poverty line. It's not like they're…

Do those charter schools get better results? IIRC, research shows no difference, but maybe that is only in specific locales.

Re: Schools for children of military achieve results rarely seen in public education

#149

I think this can be misleading in the same way some charter school results are. The easiest way to improve a school's results isn't to improve the education provided, it's to get rid of the worst performing kids. Charter schools do this by various selection effects, and artificial barriers, like ending at noon on a Wednesday. So the only kids who go there have two parents, one who probably is stay at home and can pic…

The experts interviewed in the article agree with you.
Post reply on HN