Live data from Hacker News

T-Mobile switches users to pricier plans

arstechnica.com

71–80 of 126 posts

Re: T-Mobile switches users to pricier plans

#71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How did you ask them to do it?

I called and asked them to apply SOC code: grnoptout They may play dumb so you may have to escalate.

Glad you managed to get it added on. I think I'll just switch to Google Fi if I have to start playing mind games.

Re: T-Mobile switches users to pricier plans

#72

How is this even remotely legal? I'm genuinely asking. They must have consulted with lawyers and believe it is legal. But even if their TOS say they reserve the right to change anyone's plan at any time... that seems like one of those clauses that judges always strike down. This is just flat-out providing a different service than you contracted for. This is like if I order a $200 SSD from Amazon and instead they ship…

They promise not to increase the rate on your current plan and get around this by just changing the plan you're on vs increasing the rate of your current plan.

https://www.t-mobile.com/support/account/price-lock

> Price Lock is our guarantee that we won’t raise the price of your qualifying rate plan for new accounts. You can rest assured that T-Mobile won’t raise the price of your regular monthly rate plan price for current unlimited talk, text, and data on our network on Go5G Plus, Go5G Next, Go5G, Base Essentials, Essential Savings, Essentials, Magenta, MAX, 55+, Military, First Responder, Unlimited and Lite Home Internet, and Business Unlimited plans as long as you’re a T-Mobile customer and keep your plan. And customers don’t have to do anything to get in on this – everyone who activates after April 28, 2022, with an eligible plan gets Price Lock.

Re: T-Mobile switches users to pricier plans

#74

If you're on T-Mobile, you might want to consider Google Fi. According to this data prioritization guide, Google Fi gets the same quality of service as standard-tier T-Mobile plans (lower QCI values are better, and both are on QCI 6): https://www.reddit.com/r/NoContract/comments/oaophe/data_pri... > QCI 6 is applied to all of T-Mobile's postpaid and prepaid plans (except for Essentials) and Google Fi which also has Q…

Trusting something as important as my phone number to an organization as fickle as Google seems insane.

Re: T-Mobile switches users to pricier plans

#75

If you're on T-Mobile, you might want to consider Google Fi. According to this data prioritization guide, Google Fi gets the same quality of service as standard-tier T-Mobile plans (lower QCI values are better, and both are on QCI 6): https://www.reddit.com/r/NoContract/comments/oaophe/data_pri... > QCI 6 is applied to all of T-Mobile's postpaid and prepaid plans (except for Essentials) and Google Fi which also has Q…

Trusting something as important as my phone number to an organization as fickle as Google seems insane.

Agreed. Ten bucks says they'll sell off Fi within the next 10 years. See Google Domains sell off to Squarespace as a recent example.

Re: T-Mobile switches users to pricier plans

#76

They also send their previous customer's accounts in debt collection even if they have paid in full when closing the account. Happened with me. Got a debt collector's letter a few years later. I had the proof of payment but still ended up paying again to prevent damage to my credit. Later on found on reddit that they have done this with many people, some of whom didn't have means to pay again, so ended up taking a cr…

Given the history of data breaches, my first thought is that this could have been a scam. For anyone else in this position (esp. if you’re fairly certain it’s not a scam), here is some info on what you can do: https://consumer.ftc.gov/articles/fake-abusive-debt-collecto...

Edit: namely, this part:

> your debt collection rights, including your right to get information about the original creditor if you ask for it within 30 days of getting validation information from the collector

Re: T-Mobile switches users to pricier plans

#77

If you're on T-Mobile, you might want to consider Google Fi. According to this data prioritization guide, Google Fi gets the same quality of service as standard-tier T-Mobile plans (lower QCI values are better, and both are on QCI 6): https://www.reddit.com/r/NoContract/comments/oaophe/data_pri... > QCI 6 is applied to all of T-Mobile's postpaid and prepaid plans (except for Essentials) and Google Fi which also has Q…

Trusting something as important as my phone number to an organization as fickle as Google seems insane.

Good point. Customer service is non-existent with Google as well.

Re: T-Mobile switches users to pricier plans

#78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

13 years here, what MVNO did you pick? I'm looking at visible and US cellular.

9 years (and 2-3 lines) here, moving to Mint. Should have done this a long time ago...

Be aware of data prioritization with MVNOs.

Mint uses the T-Mobile network but is one tier below T-mobile subscribers:

https://www.reddit.com/r/NoContract/comments/oaophe/data_pri...

Lower QCI values are better.

> QCI 6 is applied to all of T-Mobile's postpaid and prepaid plans (except for Essentials) and Google Fi which also has QCI 6 as well. This means if you want the absolute best from T-Mobile, you want to get a plan directly from them. Even their cheap $10 prepaid 1GB Connect plan has priority data.

QCI 7 is applied to T-Mobile’s Essentials plan as well as all MVNOs (besides Google Fi) such as Mint, Metro By T-Mobile, US Mobile GSM LTE, and Tello.

Re: T-Mobile switches users to pricier plans

#79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Trusting something as important as my phone number to an organization as fickle as Google seems insane.

Agreed. Ten bucks says they'll sell off Fi within the next 10 years. See Google Domains sell off to Squarespace as a recent example.

And there is no telling who'll buy it... probably a company like Comcast / Xfinity which is already universally hated.

Re: T-Mobile switches users to pricier plans

#80

Almost 25 years ago, Fucked Company did such a beautiful job of aggregating countless parallel stories as the dot-com bubble started to burst. It made it so easy to see what was going on in aggregate. There’s an opportunity for the same sort of thing now, but tracking all the desperate scrambling for revenue as the “we’ll make money after the next 10x users, promise” loses its ground as a business model.

Yep, and they have spin off boards from FC but they are all a shell of itself. It's interesting how it goes around again.
Post reply on HN