Introducing SDFRY, The Modern Programming Language
1–10 of 19 posts
Re: Introducing SDFRY, The Modern Programming Language
#2"I have no choice but to share it [...] only with people who are worthy."
OK HN, time to put this guy in his place. Who's got enough Rails experience to re-implement this by tonight?
Re: Introducing SDFRY, The Modern Programming Language
#3"I have no choice but to share it [...] only with people who are worthy." OK HN, time to put this guy in his place. Who's got enough Rails experience to re-implement this by tonight?
Pretty sure it's a joke.
Re: Introducing SDFRY, The Modern Programming Language
#4Re: Introducing SDFRY, The Modern Programming Language
#5"A better solution than splitting your code into multiple files would be to re-think your code and write it better."
Great advice, or greatest advice?
Re: Introducing SDFRY, The Modern Programming Language
#6Before everyone goes nuts: April 1st
The day when looking at any internet news sites is a waste of time.
Re: Introducing SDFRY, The Modern Programming Language
#7Before everyone goes nuts: April 1st The day when looking at any internet news sites is a waste of time.
In its defense, it was a piece of very well written and scathing satire.
Re: Introducing SDFRY, The Modern Programming Language
#8Before everyone goes nuts: April 1st The day when looking at any internet news sites is a waste of time.
In its defense, it was a piece of very well written and scathing satire.
As a piece, it seems to try hard but unintentionally suggests a shallow understanding of programming languages.
Re: Introducing SDFRY, The Modern Programming Language
#9This is one of the funniest things I've read in ages. As a ruby developer, it hits close to home :)
notwithstanding
It's a modern day INTERCAL, although it needs to be expanded before it can compete with INTERCAL's majesty.
Re: Introducing SDFRY, The Modern Programming Language
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
In its defense, it was a piece of very well written and scathing satire.
As a piece, it seems to try hard but unintentionally suggests a shallow understanding of programming languages.
How so? I saw it ragging on the current crop of faddish languages and palette-swaps of existing ones (coffeescript, dart, to a lesser extent go), the oddly celebrated amateurishness of current programming language's design, with whatever bit of actual computer science mentioned in passing being pushed aside to make space for the grand vision of language usability held by the author, which usually is ad-hoc to the last three programs written by him/her.