Show HN: Explore doctors' disciplinary history
11–20 of 66 posts
Re: Show HN: Explore doctors' disciplinary history
#12One pet peeve, though. Some entries have "Arbitration Award" listed as an action. However, these usually mean that the physician won an arbitration case (i.e. the ruling was in their favour). Listing them without any differentiation can potentially negatively bias a person's opinion against a perfectly honest doctor.
Re: Show HN: Explore doctors' disciplinary history
#13Re: Show HN: Explore doctors' disciplinary history
#14Re: Show HN: Explore doctors' disciplinary history
#15I just read one of these via your site at random. Holy crap, talk about incompetence! https://web.archive.org/web/0/https://www2.mbc.ca.gov/PDL/do...
[0] https://web.archive.org/web/20230925064351/https://www2.mbc....
Re: Show HN: Explore doctors' disciplinary history
#16Excellent, thank you for creating this. Just learning that this data is available. Only California? Are the other states not making the data available in the same fashion as CA? Also, was there a personal trigger for you to create this?
And the higher volume Open Data Portal dataset: https://data.wa.gov/Health/Health-Care-Provider-Credential-D...
Re: Show HN: Explore doctors' disciplinary history
#17That's a really interesting project ! One pet peeve, though. Some entries have "Arbitration Award" listed as an action. However, these usually mean that the physician won an arbitration case (i.e. the ruling was in their favour). Listing them without any differentiation can potentially negatively bias a person's opinion against a perfectly honest doctor.
Re: Show HN: Explore doctors' disciplinary history
#18I just read one of these via your site at random. Holy crap, talk about incompetence! https://web.archive.org/web/0/https://www2.mbc.ca.gov/PDL/do...
>Respondent admits that there were billings for 35 treatments apiece for two undercover law enforcement officers when each had only five visits. Further, he acknowledged that had he known the true facts, he would have investigated further. However, had he been vigilant, respondent does not believe that he would have detected the problem because patient signatures, as evidence that the patient received treatment, were forged after he issued his reports.
I didn't realize that undercover agents were/are doing sting operations for insurance fraud. (And I don't understand the part about forged signatures...)
Re: Show HN: Explore doctors' disciplinary history
#191. When I search by "Malpractice Settlements", I get a "Minified React error #31" on every result I click on.
2. You're doing something horrible with the back button - I clicked on one result and had to click the back button 10 times to get out of your site.