Chinese Netizen Fined over 1M Yuan for Using VPN
31–40 of 157 posts
Re: Chinese Netizen Fined over 1M Yuan for Using VPN
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
They built it by kicking everything else out of their internal market. It’s however questionable how competitive they are on the global stage. Take Baidu Maps it launched in 2005, by 2016 it had 348 million users per month, but was still limited to China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. Now days it covers the world but a foreign user finds the UI is still largely in Chinese rather than being localized. That’s just one e…
Google was hardly kicked out in 2010. And in 2018 they were going to re-enter under essentially the same political conditions (Dragonfly), but it was pressure from American politicians/the public that deterred them from doing so. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragonfly_(search_engine)
Re: Chinese Netizen Fined over 1M Yuan for Using VPN
#33I don't actually understand the Chinese rules on uncensored internet access. When I travel to China with a mobile phone subscription that supports roaming, I get completely uncensored access to the internet. Surely this is according to Chinese rules. Likewise all the expats and Chinese I have met all used whatever they wanted of US social media plus they had a shit ton of pirated(?) American TV shows and movies. Perh…
Re: Chinese Netizen Fined over 1M Yuan for Using VPN
#34Re: Chinese Netizen Fined over 1M Yuan for Using VPN
#35There's no possibility of China having a competitive tech industry with these kinds of restrictions.
Re: Chinese Netizen Fined over 1M Yuan for Using VPN
#36I don't actually understand the Chinese rules on uncensored internet access. When I travel to China with a mobile phone subscription that supports roaming, I get completely uncensored access to the internet. Surely this is according to Chinese rules. Likewise all the expats and Chinese I have met all used whatever they wanted of US social media plus they had a shit ton of pirated(?) American TV shows and movies. Perh…
Re: Chinese Netizen Fined over 1M Yuan for Using VPN
#37I don't actually understand the Chinese rules on uncensored internet access. When I travel to China with a mobile phone subscription that supports roaming, I get completely uncensored access to the internet. Surely this is according to Chinese rules. Likewise all the expats and Chinese I have met all used whatever they wanted of US social media plus they had a shit ton of pirated(?) American TV shows and movies. Perh…
Re: Chinese Netizen Fined over 1M Yuan for Using VPN
#38There's no possibility of China having a competitive tech industry with these kinds of restrictions.
China has literally already built the second largest tech sector on the planet on restrictions like this
Re: Chinese Netizen Fined over 1M Yuan for Using VPN
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Google was hardly kicked out in 2010. And in 2018 they were going to re-enter under essentially the same political conditions (Dragonfly), but it was pressure from American politicians/the public that deterred them from doing so. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragonfly_(search_engine)
Protectionism need not be binary. As one example, Chinese users of Google and many foreign companies websites hosted inside China experienced random slowdowns making them significantly less appealing to users. This is distinct from the blanket slowdown users experience when they access foreign websites from within China.
> This is distinct from the blanket slowdown users experience when they access foreign websites from within China
... I'm reasonably sure that happened after Google's exit from China, and the slowness complaints were about accessing Google services outside the GFW either in HK or abroad. (Not all Google services overseas were blocked: for example, Google+ was accessible albeit unreliable and slow.) I don't recall any slowness complaints about Google.cn (which was hosted inside China) when it was still a thing.
Re: Chinese Netizen Fined over 1M Yuan for Using VPN
#40Not saying I prefer the Chinese system, but it’s interesting that in this specific case it’s probably more lenient.
EDIT: But I guess this guy didn’t have the option to report the income and pay his taxes? In that case it’s definitely another dimension of repression…