Live data from Hacker News

X confuses the masses by removing all details from links

theregister.com

31–40 of 84 posts

Re: X confuses the masses by removing all details from links

#31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or it's self-aware mockery from a website that deliberately riffs on breathless and overblown British tabloid journalism.

I think Brits will have to get used to outsiders not understanding their culture as much as they did in the past.

Alternatively non-Brits may need to recognize that they aren't the primary target audience of British media and it's not a problem if they misunderstand something.

Re: X confuses the masses by removing all details from links

#32
post #23

This is an unpopular opinion, but I think Hacker News would be a worse experience with link previews. One of the best things about this site, ui-wise, is that it feels "focused". The focus is not on the links posted but on the text surrounding them, if you want to give a preview for what your link is talking about, you just explain it. It also encourages less lazy discussion, because the title and pictures don't jump…

But they've done the opposite, dropped the headline and just kept the picture. When you can only advertise your content through the picture, you get YouTube thumbnails, not HN.

Re: X confuses the masses by removing all details from links

#33
post #16

> "Our algorithm tries to optimize time spent on X, so links don't get as much attention, because there is less time spent if people click away," the billionaire said. ... at that point he might as well say "maximize" instead of "optimize"

I don’t understand this move at all. “There is less time spent if people click away” So now people are forced to click every link if they want to see what it’s about? Can’t stay on Twitter and get the headline and lead-in? I would think these link previews let people stay on twitter but what do I know. I’ve stopped using it a long time ago. The mastodon app I use has link previews so this won’t affect me much.

Have they de-discovered a/b testing? Presumably it would have told them whether users stay or go because they have to click the link to find out what it is.

Re: X confuses the masses by removing all details from links

#35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What makes you think your opinion is unpopular?

Nobody wants to start off their comment with, "this is an utterly banal statement," not enough gravitas.

GSV The Banality of Gravitas

Re: X confuses the masses by removing all details from links

#36

If twitter really wants to "boost engagement" I'd suggest maybe not forcing people to log in or have JS enabled, but maybe that's just me. I haven't viewed anything on the platform itself since they made those changes.

Ah yes, catering to Ludddites will surely boost engagement.

Re: X confuses the masses by removing all details from links

#37

If twitter really wants to "boost engagement" I'd suggest maybe not forcing people to log in or have JS enabled, but maybe that's just me. I haven't viewed anything on the platform itself since they made those changes.

Even Mastodon is unusable without JS enabled, forget about Twitter caring.

Re: X confuses the masses by removing all details from links

#38

"Who wouldn't want Elon Musk by their side, leading product?" - Linda Thankfully no one will possibly consider just putting the titles inside the images in 48pt font with eye-bursting colors and no way to respond to user/device-specific configuration, right?

Adding Dodgecoin meme's to the UI - yep he is a genius.

Re: X confuses the masses by removing all details from links

#39
Will it become a twitter blue feature? I feel this might be one (weird) way to increase twitter blue subscriptions.

not sure it will work, but in an age where car heated seats and printer ink cartridges are behind subscriptions, why not this?

It's the age of nickel-and-diming, so I expect more of such weird antics to continue and spread to other websites.

Post reply on HN