Live data from Hacker News

Google Pixel Watch 2

store.google.com

61–70 of 114 posts

Re: Google Pixel Watch 2

#61

How can people tolerate a watch that's half an inch thick? That's like twice the thickness of my phone.

Pixel "Watch": Mic, Speaker, Wi-Fi, LTE, GPS, Compass, Altimeter, SpO2, ECG, Heart Rate, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Ambient, Light, Conductance, Temp, Barometer, Magnetometer, Wireless Charging, 2GB RAM, 32GB Flash

...but its 12mm thick?! xD

And it's free with purchase of their flagship? Who could resist?

PS> I don't work for Google/Pixel or any affiliated group.

Re: Google Pixel Watch 2

#62
post #44

I had no idea the battery life on most smart watches is so bad that "24 hours of screen on battery life" is something to brag about. The apple watch is no better. My Garmin Forerunner 945 (a running focused smart watch), more than two years old at this point, gets nearly two weeks of battery life on a single charge, and it's got an always-on screen as well. --- Quick edit: Even the latest Forerunner 965, which has an…

There is almost no point in comparing the two, they're completely different devices. My apple watch has 4g and can stream spotify for example, I can take phone calls from anyone anywhere.

Yeah I hear a lot of people bring up the battery life thing but the Apple Watch and wearOS devices are fully functional computers in their own right. If you do want a fitness appliance of sorts it's really not these devices.

Regardless, I find a fast charger while showering makes the watch last plenty long.

Re: Google Pixel Watch 2

#63

I had no idea the battery life on most smart watches is so bad that "24 hours of screen on battery life" is something to brag about. The apple watch is no better. My Garmin Forerunner 945 (a running focused smart watch), more than two years old at this point, gets nearly two weeks of battery life on a single charge, and it's got an always-on screen as well. --- Quick edit: Even the latest Forerunner 965, which has an…

My affordable Fitbit inspire’s battery life is also more than 2 weeks that I have to set a reminder to charge it because the battery life is so long.

Re: Google Pixel Watch 2

#64
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How can people tolerate charging a watch each night? I can't get behind this idea of having a basket of electronics you need to babysit all the time so they don't run out of battery. Especially when we already have really battery efficient tech, like hybrid watches with e-ink display.

I'm more on the level of wondering why people want a mini smartphone on their wrist. Isn't one in your pocket enough? I do like having a heart-rate tracker, but having had a couple of fitbits the novelty eventually wears off and the reality that knowing the numbers isn't important sets in.

Not having to reach for the phone is pretty convenient, I can just leave my phone on my bed while cooking or working or whatever else and thus only care about truly important notifications, and because it doesn't involve a full "context switch" of pulling out a phone, it doesn't really feel intrusive, being just enough info for me to be able to determine if it justifies pausing what I'm doing and reaching for a phone or just making a mental note to get back to it after finishing what I'm doing.

Also, if my hands are full/dirty I can still control media playback (granted that using the nose to tap on a watch probably looks pretty funny), and have weather right on my wrist (which is surprisingly handy).

Edit: Also it turns out to be the best kind of alarm for me. Audio alarms are annoying (also to anyone else who has to hear it) and don't really tend to wake me up nicely. Turns out the slight vibration of the watch wakes me up pretty nicely without bothering people in other rooms.

Re: Google Pixel Watch 2

#65
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, transflective screens consume MUCH less energy than a OLED/LCD or whatever display tech that these watches have that require backlights to function. The Garmin works just fine without an active backlight (due to transflective) and has much fewer colors and worse resolution and worse refresh rate. It also does not have a touchscreen which also consumes lots of energy. The modern smart watch advertises always on s…

My Amazfit GTS 2 mini also manages 2 weeks on battery and it's got an OLED screen that I've set to always on, and it's got a touchscreen. And it's a small and light watch so the battery can't be that big. I think the biggest battery waste is the full OS. Like the Garmins my watch doesn't have installable apps. Ps Garmin also sells OLED touch models with long battery life. Like the venu

Garmin smartwatches support installable apps.

https://apps.garmin.com/

Re: Google Pixel Watch 2

#66

I had no idea the battery life on most smart watches is so bad that "24 hours of screen on battery life" is something to brag about. The apple watch is no better. My Garmin Forerunner 945 (a running focused smart watch), more than two years old at this point, gets nearly two weeks of battery life on a single charge, and it's got an always-on screen as well. --- Quick edit: Even the latest Forerunner 965, which has an…

this is why I prefer a hybrid watch over a smartwatch. My Amazfit T-Rex and Withings Steel HR batteries last a month

Re: Google Pixel Watch 2

#67
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, transflective screens consume MUCH less energy than a OLED/LCD or whatever display tech that these watches have that require backlights to function. The Garmin works just fine without an active backlight (due to transflective) and has much fewer colors and worse resolution and worse refresh rate. It also does not have a touchscreen which also consumes lots of energy. The modern smart watch advertises always on s…

My Amazfit GTS 2 mini also manages 2 weeks on battery and it's got an OLED screen that I've set to always on, and it's got a touchscreen. And it's a small and light watch so the battery can't be that big. I think the biggest battery waste is the full OS. Like the Garmins my watch doesn't have installable apps. Ps Garmin also sells OLED touch models with long battery life. Like the venu

IME the OLED Garmins don't have that long of battery life if you have the display set to always-on. For me (Forerunner 265), it lasts maybe 3 days. Better than an Apple Watch, but not nearly as good as an Amazfit.

Re: Google Pixel Watch 2

#68

I had no idea the battery life on most smart watches is so bad that "24 hours of screen on battery life" is something to brag about. The apple watch is no better. My Garmin Forerunner 945 (a running focused smart watch), more than two years old at this point, gets nearly two weeks of battery life on a single charge, and it's got an always-on screen as well. --- Quick edit: Even the latest Forerunner 965, which has an…

My Fossil Hybrid HR has (real) motorised hands sitting on top of an e-paper display. 2 weeks of battery pretty easily. Just a shame that the syncing software halves the battery of your phone, requires privacy-invasion talking-back-to-the-server bullshit, and is ugly and useless to boot. But still required for watch functionality. Christ I wish more smartwatches were hybrid & e-paper displays. I just seems the most ob…

I miss my Pebble. I have a Garmin now, but it lacks many basic functionalities, especially around notifications. For example, if someone texts me a few times in a row, I can't scroll to get to prior notifications. Lame!

Re: Google Pixel Watch 2

#69

400 bucks for a device they refuse to repair if you break it, and refuse to make spare parts. Not a very wise purchase.

The device’s utility is what gives it value. I appreciate that repairability is a desirable aspect, but it’s not the tipping point for most people. Repairabilty is a “what if” feature.

It's not just about the value. It's about sustainability and screwing customers over. They should at least make spare parts available.

Just telling the customers "just buy a new one" if they have a cracked screen is just not acceptable in 2023.

Re: Google Pixel Watch 2

#70
post #16

How can people tolerate a watch that's half an inch thick? That's like twice the thickness of my phone.

How can people tolerate charging a watch each night? I can't get behind this idea of having a basket of electronics you need to babysit all the time so they don't run out of battery. Especially when we already have really battery efficient tech, like hybrid watches with e-ink display.

While many replies point out that you can charge at night, this would defeat one of the main reasons I use a smartwatch, which is to have an alarm that vibrates to wake me up without waking up my wife. Other people use watches to track sleep. If you don't ever use it for either, I guess charging every night isn't an issue (though it means one more cable to bring whenever you travel). But for those of us who like the alarm or sleep-tracking features, that's pretty much a non-starter.

I understand that they're getting to the point where you can charge just while showering, but aren't quite there yet.

Post reply on HN