Live data from Hacker News

Canada to regulate podcasts

podnews.net

31–40 of 105 posts

Re: Canada to regulate podcasts

#31

Because the “free for all” market that gave rise to Alex Jones and FOX news, etc. really improved American society…

For an outsider it's baffling to see 50% of the US slowly getting brainwashed to the point where they reject all facts out of spite, and think it is important to be contrarian on literally every social issue.

Intentional, and weaponized, delusion of the masses is a pretty common condition in any adequately-large society.

Usually, delusion in the form of institutional acceptance. Religion, nationalism, etc.

Currently in the US, in the form of institutional rejection, which is equally dishonest, but considerably more messy.

Re: Canada to regulate podcasts

#33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And im not sure how a requirement to register translates into censorship.

The CRTC News Release explicitly states: "Today, the CRTC is advancing its regulatory plan to modernize Canada’s broadcasting framework and ensure online streaming services make meaningful contributions to Canadian and Indigenous content." I would ask, who decides what is 'meaningful'? This sounds like an open door to censorship to me. Was not the requirement to make 'meaningful' contributions to society the excuse u…

[deleted]

Re: Canada to regulate podcasts

#34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And im not sure how a requirement to register translates into censorship.

The CRTC News Release explicitly states: "Today, the CRTC is advancing its regulatory plan to modernize Canada’s broadcasting framework and ensure online streaming services make meaningful contributions to Canadian and Indigenous content." I would ask, who decides what is 'meaningful'? This sounds like an open door to censorship to me. Was not the requirement to make 'meaningful' contributions to society the excuse u…

They are referring to the CanCon rules https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/cancon.htm

The rules have been around for 40+ years in one form or another.

Re: Canada to regulate podcasts

#36
post #18

We should expect more licensing of tech companies in the future. Both in terms of the kinds of services that will require licenses to operate, and in the number of jurisdictions that require them. If you want to run a hotel or a burger joint or a general contractor, you need a license. It will be difficult to push back against the idea that tech companies should be treated the same. Not saying that this will be a goo…

Suddenly, Google's deprecation of their podcast software makes a little more sense. Not much, but a little. That said, online streaming services are an odd one to target. I would expect the bigger fish to be website hosts, stores, etc. Or is that already regulated similarly?

The key thing to remember is that, pre-multimedia/pre-Internet, Canada had effective government control over broadcast media. Actually, every country did, because broadcast frequencies being finite was an effective counterargument against the 1st Amendment. Canada in particular used their de-facto censorship power to enforce "Canadian Content" regulations - as in, your radio station must push a certain percentage of music or talk shows deemed sufficiently "Canadian" enough by Canada's radio regulator.

The Internet functionally destroyed this regime by walking away from publicly regulated spectrum. Canada wants those powers back, so they passed a bill which lets them apply Canadian Content regulations to streaming services that Canadians use. The podcast registration requirement is an extension of this: if they plan to require that people listen to[0] a certain percentage of Canadian Content[1] podcasts, then they need the services that push them to users to register so they know who to enforce the rules on.

Website hosts and stores would be regulated under other rules that are very similar to the ones in other Anglosphere countries, i.e. without this weird censorship regime. It's only "streaming services" - i.e. "websites that look like something that would have been regulated under CRTC CanCon rules if they didn't have the Internet" - that are getting regulated here.

[0] The Internet is ostensibly a "pull" medium, but in practice, everyone has recommendation algorithms which look like a more elaborate version of a broadcaster if you squint at them.

[0] Which, BTW, is not content made by Canadians. If you're a Canadian creative you have to jump through a lot of hoops in order to be officially recognized as "Canadian Content".

Re: Canada to regulate podcasts

#37
post #6

Maybe I misunderstand, but this is a requirement for platforms to register (Apple, Google, Spotify, Twitter, etc). The fear is of indirect censorship. As was the case with law enforcement/intelligence informally requesting take downs in the US, Canada will be making this process formal.

My fear isn't indirect censorship, it is that companies will rather pull out of the Canadian market than pay to have content developed, acquired or managed to meet the CanCon rules. Canada's current spat with Google over news is a recent example.

Re: Canada to regulate podcasts

#38
post #15

CRTC, like most Canadian regulators, do not have the resources to enforce their rules. This will be yet another useless unenforceable burden.

I'm sure they will find the resources to censor that which bothers them (which is the point of the bill). Imagine the Jordan Peterson podcast being blocked in Canada. Wild.

Re: Canada to regulate podcasts

#39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For an outsider it's baffling to see 50% of the US slowly getting brainwashed to the point where they reject all facts out of spite, and think it is important to be contrarian on literally every social issue.

Which half are you talking about :D The reason for the two alternate realities in the same country is primarily to do with what information you consume. As an exercise, go to the front page of Reddit everyday. You will almost always notice on the first page or the first few there are always posts on politics. And the vast majority of these posts are the "bad" takes/actions/scandals on rebuplicans/conservatives. If yo…

I think "upvote/downvote" mechanisms make the problem even worse, as nobody uses it in the supposedly correct way.

The mechanism heavily contributes towards group-think, with any dissenting opinion being completely buried.

Re: Canada to regulate podcasts

#40
post #28

About 70% of jobs in USA/Canada are regulated. I think we are well past the useful regulations.

And how would you suggest regulation to keep up with technology if we just stop regulating after a certain threshold?
Post reply on HN