21–30 of 199 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also Android doesn't support DHCPv6
What's the benefit of DHCPv6 over SLAAC (genuine question, never looked into DHCPv6 at all)
SLAAC just tells the endpoint device to self-assign an address and to roll with it. For example, there’s no way to pass in DNS servers with SLAAC.
ssh 64:ff9b::1.3.3.7 What address syntax is that? I mean I can easily guess what it means, but I wasn't aware such mixture exists. Do connect(2) and friends support that?
It's an RFC6052 address.
Edit: RFC1884 from 1995 already had it, nothing has changed in that aspect.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's the benefit of DHCPv6 over SLAAC (genuine question, never looked into DHCPv6 at all)
all of the DHCP options, for example. SLAAC just tells the endpoint device to self-assign an address and to roll with it. For example, there’s no way to pass in DNS servers with SLAAC.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
all of the DHCP options, for example. SLAAC just tells the endpoint device to self-assign an address and to roll with it. For example, there’s no way to pass in DNS servers with SLAAC.
Can't you provide DNS servers as part of router advertisement packets ? RFC8106
Earlier quoted context omitted.
all of the DHCP options, for example. SLAAC just tells the endpoint device to self-assign an address and to roll with it. For example, there’s no way to pass in DNS servers with SLAAC.
Can't you provide DNS servers as part of router advertisement packets ? RFC8106
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's the benefit of DHCPv6 over SLAAC (genuine question, never looked into DHCPv6 at all)
all of the DHCP options, for example. SLAAC just tells the endpoint device to self-assign an address and to roll with it. For example, there’s no way to pass in DNS servers with SLAAC.
The main advantage of Linux over other systems is that its available from source and thus can be patched and recompiled easily. Here we see someone using LD_PRELOAD to patch the behavior of a binary, because they rely on distributions pre-compiled packages without means to change the source code themselves. This sort of negates that advantage, right?
The main advantage of Linux over other systems is that its available from source and thus can be patched and recompiled easily. Here we see someone using LD_PRELOAD to patch the behavior of a binary, because they rely on distributions pre-compiled packages without means to change the source code themselves. This sort of negates that advantage, right?