Super cool! I tried doing a pure IPv6 network a little over a decade ago; Maybe I’ll try it again. Though, my cheap IoT devices likely still need IPv4… but perhaps not internet connectivity. It might be fun to explore just how much IPv4 continues to be ingrained into cheap Things (eg: Arduino WiFI?) There always seems to be a long tail of small places where IPv4 pops straight back into the equation.
Small places? When I disabled IPv4 a few weeks ago, I couldn't use: HN, GitHub, Reddit, Discord, Duckduckgo.
Enabling IPv6 support for IPv4-only apps on Linux
11–20 of 199 posts
Re: Enabling IPv6 support for IPv4-only apps on Linux
#12 ssh 64:ff9b::1.3.3.7
What address syntax is that? I mean I can easily guess what it means, but I wasn't aware such mixture exists. Do connect(2) and friends support that?Re: Enabling IPv6 support for IPv4-only apps on Linux
#13Super cool! I tried doing a pure IPv6 network a little over a decade ago; Maybe I’ll try it again. Though, my cheap IoT devices likely still need IPv4… but perhaps not internet connectivity. It might be fun to explore just how much IPv4 continues to be ingrained into cheap Things (eg: Arduino WiFI?) There always seems to be a long tail of small places where IPv4 pops straight back into the equation.
Small places? When I disabled IPv4 a few weeks ago, I couldn't use: HN, GitHub, Reddit, Discord, Duckduckgo.
Re: Enabling IPv6 support for IPv4-only apps on Linux
#14Re: Enabling IPv6 support for IPv4-only apps on Linux
#15Super cool! I tried doing a pure IPv6 network a little over a decade ago; Maybe I’ll try it again. Though, my cheap IoT devices likely still need IPv4… but perhaps not internet connectivity. It might be fun to explore just how much IPv4 continues to be ingrained into cheap Things (eg: Arduino WiFI?) There always seems to be a long tail of small places where IPv4 pops straight back into the equation.
I recently had to setup a non-encrypted website because I have a few old devices that can no longer do HTTPS.
IPv4 on local networks will probably exist for a very long time.
Re: Enabling IPv6 support for IPv4-only apps on Linux
#16ssh 64:ff9b::1.3.3.7 What address syntax is that? I mean I can easily guess what it means, but I wasn't aware such mixture exists. Do connect(2) and friends support that?
Re: Enabling IPv6 support for IPv4-only apps on Linux
#17ssh 64:ff9b::1.3.3.7 What address syntax is that? I mean I can easily guess what it means, but I wasn't aware such mixture exists. Do connect(2) and friends support that?
In the example, 64:ff9b::103:307 is equivalent. A more complicated example might be akin to 64:ff9b::198.51.100.231, equivalent to 64:ff9b::c633:64e7.
Re: Enabling IPv6 support for IPv4-only apps on Linux
#18Super cool! I tried doing a pure IPv6 network a little over a decade ago; Maybe I’ll try it again. Though, my cheap IoT devices likely still need IPv4… but perhaps not internet connectivity. It might be fun to explore just how much IPv4 continues to be ingrained into cheap Things (eg: Arduino WiFI?) There always seems to be a long tail of small places where IPv4 pops straight back into the equation.
Small places? When I disabled IPv4 a few weeks ago, I couldn't use: HN, GitHub, Reddit, Discord, Duckduckgo.
None of those sites have v6 though, so you'll need some form of backwards compatibility running to reach them. Presumably you were missing that.
Re: Enabling IPv6 support for IPv4-only apps on Linux
#19Re: Enabling IPv6 support for IPv4-only apps on Linux
#20"To prove that IPv6 is ready for production use, I built a second PC so I can access the IPv4 Internet"
And after transition is done, in theory, all you’d do would be turn off the translation box. In practice you’ll have to keep it up until the end of days, but that’s a separate matter.