Live data from Hacker News

What Is the Future of the DAW?

djmag.com

101–110 of 223 posts

Re: What Is the Future of the DAW?

#101
post #94

No mention of Bitwig, which just keeps adding new features and modularity.

No mention of Bitwig, which just keeps adding new features and modularity.

Bitwig is mentioned three times in the article.

That said, I don't think the article author would consider Bitwig to be substantially novel compared to the other mainstream DAWs that inspired the sentiment behind the article.

Re: What Is the Future of the DAW?

#102

What I really miss in DAWs is a drum arranging tool that goes beyond scores or xoxo grids. Those are good for editing patterns in atomic ways, but I'd love something to quickly record new patterns played on drum pads on the fly, with arbitrary duration, create a new pattern that inherits parts of the one I just recorded (to make variations and fills) just by hitting one key and/or sending a MIDI note from a controlle…

Most of what you’re talking about is pretty easy to do in Ableton.

Re: What Is the Future of the DAW?

#103
post #94

No mention of Bitwig, which just keeps adding new features and modularity.

I want to love Bitwig, but the UI needs serious work as does compatibility with external controllers like the Novation Launchpad (which is what I sequence all of my music through). I’m hoping the next release addresses both of these.

Re: What Is the Future of the DAW?

#104

TFA starts down an important path - identifying different categories of users - but doesn't really get this quite right IMO. There are (at least) four categories of DAW users: 1. Professionals who are being paid to make music, and for whom time is essentially money. Tools that speed up the production of that music are both financially valuable to them, and also make their overall lives easier (if done right). 2. Musi…

5. People who record, but have nothing to do with music whatsoever. For example, I have literally no musical skills whatsoever, but have at least 15k hours in my DAW. I'm a Voice actor, who worked hard to customize my DAW to get rid of as much music making stuff as possible from cluttering my interface (Reaper FTW) It's a Digital AUDIO workstation, not a Digital MUSIC workstation

Can you share your workflow? I've tried using Resolve and Audacity yet it all feels awkward and is painfully slow

Re: What Is the Future of the DAW?

#105
To be honest, I really like existing tools and workflows and I don't really want that to change.

> Open a DAW from the year 2000 and it’s highly likely you’ll recognise the vast majority of the features — both functionally and visually — from any DAW you might use today.

This assertion that "old is bad" really, really needs to die. Change for the sake of change is bad. I don't see why all these new innovations can't be baked into existing workflows in a natural and intuitive fashion.

But then, in some cases, do I really want them? Like generative AI for music. I'm not sure but leaning towards no.

Re: What Is the Future of the DAW?

#106
Feels like "what is the future of the word processor" but with some weird expectation that you're expecting to see leaps and bounds.

Look, FWIW, my favorite music making "stack" is

- Fruityloops (as in, sure I'll use FL Studio but it was pretty much solid for me when it was called that)

- Sony ACID. Still unbeatable to me for quickly layering/previewing multiple tracks of loops

- Cool Edit Pro/Adobe Audition. Still much nicer than Audacity. I don't know why Audacity remains so popular, it's way clunkier than the above

Ableton/Bitwig are also fun to play with and I could see them being indispensable for some, but what more do people need that you couldn't theoretically get "incrementally" or "with plugins?"

Re: What Is the Future of the DAW?

#107

The umbrella topic to this is one of my favorite topics in all of software and one where strangely we as an industry don't seem to have internalized its lessons: That the right approach to building a software program (like a DAW, NLE, bitmap/vector editor) emerges early. This is why these applications have lifespans measured in decades, and it's extremely rare for a new player to be able offer anything new, different…

DAWs haven't converged on a "best" approach. Most use a traditional linear workflow that's essentially a digital multitrack tape, but Ableton and Bitwig use a clip-based workflow that tends to be better suited to improvisation and live performance. I think the factor you're missing is path dependence. The approach that becomes dominant isn't necessarily "best", just a stable equilibrium where switching costs are grea…

DAWs should be rebuilt from the ground up, component by component, feature by feature, in 3D for XR(VR/MR/AR) where ultimately you can see the waveform as it is --- a 3D object , and interact with it like a sculpture or a Theremin experience. 2D screens, Keyboards, and a mouse are not the best fit.

Re: What Is the Future of the DAW?

#108
I've been using Reaper as a digital mixer for live streams and recording podcasts. Great way to set up virtual channel strips for everyone and do proper mix-minus so we don't have to rely on software echo cancelation. Works a treat with netjack2 on Linux.

Re: What Is the Future of the DAW?

#109
post #10

DAW version control is one of my dreams. If I could have a really tight git equivalent for reaper projects, it’d be so cool. Plugins are, as usual, the biggest barrier there. Doesn’t seem like there will ever be a good way to deal with different people having completely different plugin collections. Unless someone makes “Netflix but for plugins” or something. The other thing I saw the other day that I thought was coo…

FLStudio lets you save a new incremental version with CTRL+N, I use that as a sort of version control so I can roll back to an older version of an ideas if needed. Doesn't provide any equivalent of merging with head or branching or anything but it gets the job done for my needs.

Re: What Is the Future of the DAW?

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

5. People who record, but have nothing to do with music whatsoever. For example, I have literally no musical skills whatsoever, but have at least 15k hours in my DAW. I'm a Voice actor, who worked hard to customize my DAW to get rid of as much music making stuff as possible from cluttering my interface (Reaper FTW) It's a Digital AUDIO workstation, not a Digital MUSIC workstation

Can you share your workflow? I've tried using Resolve and Audacity yet it all feels awkward and is painfully slow

I'd be happy too,it's mostly templates: project templates, individual fx presets, fx chain templates for corrections, sweetening and mastering, export/render prsets, filename templates, And lots of keystroke macros that help me speed up my work. Things like specific keystrokes for punch and roll, quick edits and ripple delete. It's an amalgamation of lots of small optimizations. Reaper is also really good at UI customization, so you can hide grids, measures ,snapping, and really optimize things. ChatGPT is also reasonably good at writing Lua scripts for reaper called ReaScript that can leverage the API for automations more complex than what you can do with SWS additions to the immense actions list. If you have something specific, feel free to reach out directly. I love this stuff.
Post reply on HN