https://www.qubes-os.org/ https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/system-requirements/
Everything authenticated by Microsoft is tainted
11–20 of 381 posts
Re: Everything authenticated by Microsoft is tainted
#12Give it a few years and then on-prem hardware and simple server hosting will become fashionable again.
Re: Everything authenticated by Microsoft is tainted
#13Give it a few years and then on-prem hardware and simple server hosting will become fashionable again.
Re: Everything authenticated by Microsoft is tainted
#14Give it a few years and then on-prem hardware and simple server hosting will become fashionable again.
Re: Everything authenticated by Microsoft is tainted
#15I read a good analogy recently: The titanic (cloud) is sinking, the engine room is already full of water, but the people in the ballroom (execs) are still celebrating with champagne, even though the warnings have been called multiple times.
Re: Everything authenticated by Microsoft is tainted
#16That they've chosen to integrate it with all their legacy stack (which is one of the most complicated ones in existence) is understandable and what 99% of companies would have done but... it's a horrible experience using it. Maybe people with only Microsoft experience don't feel the pain anymore.
Re: Everything authenticated by Microsoft is tainted
#17We all ought to be using Qubes OS! We, as the Hacker News community, ought to be more concerned about making it easier to use reasonably secure systems. How do I buy a computer that runs Qubes? https://www.qubes-os.org/ https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/system-requirements/
Re: Everything authenticated by Microsoft is tainted
#18Give it a few years and then on-prem hardware and simple server hosting will become fashionable again.
On-prem is very expensive compared to cloud.
[1] https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Yearly-cost-difference-o...
Re: Everything authenticated by Microsoft is tainted
#19Give it a few years and then on-prem hardware and simple server hosting will become fashionable again.
On-prem is very expensive compared to cloud.
Or is this the discussion of having a team of SysOps vs a team of Cloud Engineers?