Live data from Hacker News

Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

meta.com

351–360 of 967 posts

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#351
I had the original version of these (Ray-Ban stories), and I had to return them three times because they kept dropping the Bluetooth connection. I more or less only wore them while running, so my best guess is moisture from my sweating got into them. Given that they were advertised heavily for sports stuff, that was disappointing.

The return process was also complicated and annoying. Overall, I'd recommend against buying the first generation of these new glasses.

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#352

These could be pretty incredible if the platform was more open. You get highly available image and voice input, and good voice output. Imagine if you could take a picture of anything, add a little note, have it filed away. Not necessarily an awesome Instagram picture, but just a picture of some mail you got, a tool you are putting away, any thing you want to record and save. Heck, why not a picture of your computer s…

I would be so uncomfortable having lunch with someone wearing these. Am I alone in that?

People used to feel all kinds of ways about what is now normal smartphone use. There are probably a lot of remnants of those attitudes in ‘00s media that can still be found.

Everyone either got over it or shut up about it because they (ahem, we) had clearly lost.

I expect actually-useful smart glasses will eventually overcome the same stigma. Actually-useful being the key part of that.

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#355
post #341

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would guess there is photocell next to the LED and comparing the amount of light to the ambient light the cameras get. They might also be doing something clever and using the LED itself as a photo diode.

I wish I could find more things talking about this, but there's this classic demo of the technique: https://cs.nyu.edu/~jhan/ledtouch/index.html It has always felt under-utilized to me. Maybe it needs power-sensing hardware that's too sensitive / too fast for most scenarios / costs?

It's actually not that hard to use LEDs in this way. I think it's not done a lot because in applications that need a light sensor, a purpose-built light sensor works a whole lot better, and it's rare that space is such a premium that having one is an issue.

Glasses may be a use case where space is at a premium, though, so it could make sense there.

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#356

These could be pretty incredible if the platform was more open. You get highly available image and voice input, and good voice output. Imagine if you could take a picture of anything, add a little note, have it filed away. Not necessarily an awesome Instagram picture, but just a picture of some mail you got, a tool you are putting away, any thing you want to record and save. Heck, why not a picture of your computer s…

I would be so uncomfortable having lunch with someone wearing these. Am I alone in that?

I mean, the light makes it VERY apparent when it's recording or taking a picture.

Would you be just as uncomfortable eating lunch with someone who had their phone in their hand? It'd be much easier to surreptitiously record/photograph someone with a phone because they have no status indicator when they're recording and people inadvertently point phone lenses at each other all the time.

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#357
post #286

[*] Home surveillance cam — Check [*] Car dash cam — Check [*] Bike helmet cam — Check [*] Drone follow cam — Check [ ] Face cam Those of us in the FreeCam community have been dreaming of something like this for a long time.

What's the FreeCam community?

It's entirely fictitious – it was an attempt on my part to use satire to bring attention the various products in market designed to passively capture and record video.

If such a community were to exist I'd imagine they'd fit somewhere in the Venn diagram between smart-home enthusiasts and the quantified-self movement. Apologies for misleading you!

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#358
post #8

Any good argument that anyone can think of for a scenario where smart eyewear will not be as ubiquitous as smart phones eventually? I understand the privacy argument, but that is not going to be enough. The ability to think or blink in a certain way and capture anything you see is too powerful a tool, alongside the augmented reality that is coming.

I don't want to typical mind the world and assume very many people feel the same, but I'm at least chiming in with the few here who have already they don't like wearing any kind of jewelry or really non-essential accoutrement of any kind. I have thankfully never needed corrective glasses, but I don't wear sunglasses, either, nor a watch, nor hats. I don't even wear my wedding ring except when I'm traveling and my wife nags me enough. I get that a wearable probably feels less obtrusive than a phone to someone who actually uses their phone a lot, but I don't. It's not obtrusive sitting in my pocket and even less so when it's on my bedside table charging and I'm somewhere else without it. Anything I'm wearing is inherently there. I don't particularly want to be that integrated with a digital world. I don't usually feel much of a need to record or augment my environment.

I'd go for musculoskeletal enhancement, given how much it sucks to get old and have more or less at least one active chronic joint injury at all times no matter what, but thankfully, for now, my eyes and memory still work pretty well on their own.

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#359
post #314

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have the near opposite experience especially having attempted to build the mobile based product you mentioned [ https://placenote.com/ ] The seamlessness of glasses is really what makes this even possible, especially now that voice is becoming a seamless interface. I largely like my phone to remain in my pocket (especially when I’m with my impressionable kids) and bringing it out and unlocking, getting my brain to…

Glasses also free up both hands, which is a pretty big deal.

In addition, headgear is more-likely to be aimed at whatever you're actually observing or manipulating, instead of some direction related to a shirt-pocket or chest-harness.

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#360

> The Capture LED lets others know when you’re capturing content or going live. If the LED is covered, you’ll be notified to clear it. Wonder how that works. Maybe the capture LED has a light sensor next to it that detects reflections? It solves an interesting problem, although the prevalence of cheap spy camera glasses on amazon make it an uphill battle.

I'd presume via the same type of proximity sensors that disable your phone screen when it's held to your ear
Post reply on HN