Space Force chief says commercial satellites may need defending
1–10 of 30 posts
Re: Space Force chief says commercial satellites may need defending
#2Re: Space Force chief says commercial satellites may need defending
#3Re: Space Force chief says commercial satellites may need defending
#4Re: Space Force chief says commercial satellites may need defending
#5Re: Space Force chief says commercial satellites may need defending
#6> Saltzman didn't directly address the scenario posed in the question
> In a modern war, "there are going to be commercial entities, commercial organizations, commercial capabilities and assets that get caught up in the conflicts," Saltzman said. "Space is no different than sea lanes. It’s no different than civilian airliner traffic in Europe right now. The US has a long history of saying we’re going to protect the things that we need to be successful. So it would stand to reason that that same philosophy would extend into space, and I have no reason to believe that that will be different.”
Not much here, just a reasonable, seasoned response expertly crafted to avoid using SpaceX as a specific example. A+
Re: Space Force chief says commercial satellites may need defending
#7Re: Space Force chief says commercial satellites may need defending
#8Re: Space Force chief says commercial satellites may need defending
#9"... so, I'll need a bigger budget to help with all that defending. Let me assure the committee, that I'll use some of the money to create a space defence drama of some sort, so it becomes obvious how much that money was needed... .... which will feed into next year's budgetary proposal.
PS if anyone on the committee needs a non executive board membership in an up and coming enterprise, grab me after this meeting. K?"
Re: Space Force chief says commercial satellites may need defending
#10What's going to be there to defend after low earth orbit is saturated with shrapnel from the first battle?