Google is picking ChatGPT responses from Quora as correct answer
41–50 of 239 posts
Re: Google is picking ChatGPT responses from Quora as correct answer
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why? Wikipedia is beating AI in every respect as far as I can tell.
That's because you don't see the disruptive innovation of my idea! Seriously so, once AI writen content arrives at Wikipedia, the internet will become a lot less useful. Heck, I'd pay for a offline version of Wikipedia before it comes to that!
Re: Google is picking ChatGPT responses from Quora as correct answer
#43Given enough temperature, can't you melt an egg?
Re: Google is picking ChatGPT responses from Quora as correct answer
#44And people want to seek medical device from an AI that thinks eggs can melt…
There have been expert systems since the 90's that perform better on average than doctors when diagnosing illness in patients, and / or help doctors make better decisions.
Re: Google is picking ChatGPT responses from Quora as correct answer
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's because you don't see the disruptive innovation of my idea! Seriously so, once AI writen content arrives at Wikipedia, the internet will become a lot less useful. Heck, I'd pay for a offline version of Wikipedia before it comes to that!
It's available already, for free: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Database_download
Re: Google is picking ChatGPT responses from Quora as correct answer
#46And people want to seek medical device from an AI that thinks eggs can melt…
The problem is that people are actually finding it useful for all of those things!
I, too, would never have drawn up a functional specification for a product release which said the product might hallucinate and might be parrot incorrect facts about eggs melting if you phrase the question wrong[edit: if you insert an incorrect premise in the question], or might drive into a bus if it had a mural printed on the side. I'd have required correct performance to a lot more 9s before releasing the thing to the public than the products which have been released to the public demonstrate, or at least required a confidence metric that would allow the product to respond with an error message and escalate to a human if it thought it might fail (for tech support, not for self-driving cars, obviously).
And yet here we are. Turns out people and corporations do find utility in hallucination-prone, often-wrong, easily misled, easily confused LLM chatbots. And they'll strap a weight to the wheel of their Tesla so they can stare at their phone while it drives them on Autopilot.
Re: Google is picking ChatGPT responses from Quora as correct answer
#47I think Quora is a partner of anthropic/Claude, not sure this is ChatGPT.
Re: Google is picking ChatGPT responses from Quora as correct answer
#48Google's "answers" feature was already unreliable enough when there was only one AI involved (the one picking the answers) - I remember it once said that the capacity of an Amiga floppy was 1760 KB, because the Wikipedia page it picked ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floppy_disk_variants#Amiga ) failed to mention the capacity of the "standard" floppies and only provided a number for the (non-standard) HD floppies.
Yeah, I remember when you searched for the Dalai Lama, and returned "Nationality: Chinese".
Re: Google is picking ChatGPT responses from Quora as correct answer
#49Kagi and DDG link the same Quora thread as #1. So much for alternatives.
> You cannot melt whole eggs like you would melt ice or cheese. However, you can soften the proteins in eggs through heating.[1][2]
Reference 1 is to the Quora page, reference 2 is another Quora page.
Re: Google is picking ChatGPT responses from Quora as correct answer
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
I see a huge come back for encyclopedias looming on the horizon. Writen by AI and printed on demand of course.
funny you should mention this, but Encyclopedia Britannica is online, free, and perhaps unsurprisingly does not often show up on SERP page 1.
You mentioned SERP and I thought - doesn't matter to me, I have a custom search for Wikipedia that I use instead of google when I know there's a wikipedia for something (I've developed really good intuition for this).
But... the same isn't true for EB, but should it? Does EB ever have anything that's not on wikipedia? Like, ever?