How many mm of rolled homogeneous steel does it penetrate?
DJI Mini 4 Pro
341–350 of 452 posts
Re: DJI Mini 4 Pro
#342Earlier quoted context omitted.
Even if they are 10x more quiet, then if there are 10 of these drones flying around we're back at square one.
Both fortunately and unfortunately that's not how sound works. If the drones are far enough away from each other that you don't get interference between them soundwise it doesn't matter if there are more of them. But if they do then two quiet ones may re-inforce to the point that they sound much worse than a single larger one.
Re: DJI Mini 4 Pro
#343Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Do you know the reason why it was banned? For the infrastructure, for legit strategic reasons (without even considering they are abusing it, you generally don't want to rely on foreign infrastructure on your territory). For the smartphones, that's pure commercial war. Huawei was a big competitor.
> For the smartphones, that's pure commercial war. Huawei was a big competitor. Big competitor of what? There’s no popular Android phone OEM in the US. Sounds like you’re making stuff up.
https://www.canalys.com/newsroom/canalys-global-smartphone-m...
Re: DJI Mini 4 Pro
#344Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Do you know the reason why it was banned? For the infrastructure, for legit strategic reasons (without even considering they are abusing it, you generally don't want to rely on foreign infrastructure on your territory). For the smartphones, that's pure commercial war. Huawei was a big competitor.
> For the smartphones, that's pure commercial war. Huawei was a big competitor. Big competitor of what? There’s no popular Android phone OEM in the US. Sounds like you’re making stuff up.
Re: DJI Mini 4 Pro
#345Earlier quoted context omitted.
>They're beaming back home whatever they want This claim is always thrown out like a life preserver without ever anything to back it up. Do you have anything to support this claim?
They're cloud based, aren't they? So regardless of what they're doing with the data, it's true that they're (figuratively) beaming it back, although parent is admittedly implying more. I accept that chinese authorities generally have access to anything they want to in the country, so I would buy that they have access to drone data.
So just like the US ?
Re: DJI Mini 4 Pro
#346Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Do you know the reason why it was banned? For the infrastructure, for legit strategic reasons (without even considering they are abusing it, you generally don't want to rely on foreign infrastructure on your territory). For the smartphones, that's pure commercial war. Huawei was a big competitor.
> For the smartphones, that's pure commercial war. Huawei was a big competitor. Big competitor of what? There’s no popular Android phone OEM in the US. Sounds like you’re making stuff up.
Re: DJI Mini 4 Pro
#347I've had the original Mini since it came out. Other than damaging a prop from it hitting a blade of grass on landing it is in perfect shape. Yes, they are so fragile I landed very smoothly in the grass and soft grass is enough to damage the props! I don't fly it as much as I used to. These new ones are certainly an engineering marvel with how much they have added and still kept it under 249g. The big one to me though…
I think it's a good thing the props are fragile as the motor would be damaged if the props hit an object without absorbing the force of impact.
Re: DJI Mini 4 Pro
#348Earlier quoted context omitted.
They're cloud based, aren't they? So regardless of what they're doing with the data, it's true that they're (figuratively) beaming it back, although parent is admittedly implying more. I accept that chinese authorities generally have access to anything they want to in the country, so I would buy that they have access to drone data.
> I accept that chinese authorities generally have access to anything they want to in the country So just like the US ?
Re: DJI Mini 4 Pro
#349Earlier quoted context omitted.
You do not need to transmit the video first. But coordinate or interested person. Even a sport watch can be a security threat as demo by some exercise army personnel. They just know who and when and where these places are. For the transfer part it is much harder as said and easier to detect in peace time. But then what happen in war or proxy-war time. You have to know how many senior Russians are killed by using a ph…
> Even a sport watch can be a security threat as demo by some exercise army personnel. In the early days of the Afghan (or was it Iraq?) war, people used Strava to figure out the locations of American bases. They'd see a bunch of smart watches suddenly wake up in the morning and start exercising at the same time, a dead giveaway.
Also happened across a few American bases across Syria, Yemen, Niger, Afghanistan, Djibouti and more. Some British and Russian bases were highlighted too.