Live data from Hacker News

DJI Mini 4 Pro

dji.com

91–100 of 452 posts

Re: DJI Mini 4 Pro

#91
post #46

Streaming 1080p/60fps up to 20km wirelessly is mind boggling to me. What kind of tech is used to make that happen? seems like it'd require a lot of power.

Transmitting long distances lives on a kind of spectrum. On the one end you have MOAR PWER and on the other end you have signals analysis and robust codecs (? I'm not sure "codec" is right. Maybe encoding? Can someone answer this?) that allow for lost information. The signals analysis will clean the incoming signal and the codec/encoding will allow for robust recreation of the captured data. Most wireless transmissio…

> I'm not sure "codec" is right. Maybe encoding?

Numerology

Re: DJI Mini 4 Pro

#92
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which country was that? The drone detects the country through GPS upon startup and limits its transmission power according to the local laws. In the US, the drone can use way higher transmission power (~ 4-20 times more, depending on the drone) .

I've done it in the US and Brazil and the Carribbean.

US and Brazil follow the FCC rules. I would guess most of the Carribbean would follow FCC as well.

Re: DJI Mini 4 Pro

#93
post #22

I've had the original Mini since it came out. Other than damaging a prop from it hitting a blade of grass on landing it is in perfect shape. Yes, they are so fragile I landed very smoothly in the grass and soft grass is enough to damage the props! I don't fly it as much as I used to. These new ones are certainly an engineering marvel with how much they have added and still kept it under 249g. The big one to me though…

Another gripe about DJI for video use is that they rip you off for a "license" to use CinemaDNG... which is an open, license-free codec.

Isn’t this because they have to pay Red for their ridiculous patent of compressed raw video?

Re: DJI Mini 4 Pro

#94
post #46

Streaming 1080p/60fps up to 20km wirelessly is mind boggling to me. What kind of tech is used to make that happen? seems like it'd require a lot of power.

Transmitting long distances lives on a kind of spectrum. On the one end you have MOAR PWER and on the other end you have signals analysis and robust codecs (? I'm not sure "codec" is right. Maybe encoding? Can someone answer this?) that allow for lost information. The signals analysis will clean the incoming signal and the codec/encoding will allow for robust recreation of the captured data. Most wireless transmissio…

My RF knowledge is hobbyist only but I think the word you're looking for is "modulation", e.g. LoRa is able to work over significant distances at low power because of its clever chirp spread spectrum modulation method.

Re: DJI Mini 4 Pro

#95
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Perhaps but I fly my Mini 2 regularly, and people have a hard time finding it in the sky even when I point it out to them at 100ft. At 200ft it might as well not exist. They are so small and light, they just don't put out the dBs like bigger drones.

Being able to spot a small white object in the sky and hearing it are very different things. I put drone operators on the same level as those who hike with speakers blaring. No one is being hurt, no laws being broken. Just inconsiderate considering a large part of the experience for most in nature is the serenity.

Nah they definitely aren't as bad. People using speakers in public are actively choosing to annoy people when they could have used headphones. There's no headphone equivalent for drones.

Drones are also way way less common than shitty music players.

Re: DJI Mini 4 Pro

#96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I had the same thought seeing the hero videos on this page displaying beautiful mountain scapes and vistas - I wouldn't want to be the person disturbing this space with an intrusive drone.

screw the drone, anybody know what the motorized surfboard things are?

Called an efoil, they also have non electric versions that are much cheaper

Re: DJI Mini 4 Pro

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Another gripe about DJI for video use is that they rip you off for a "license" to use CinemaDNG... which is an open, license-free codec.

Isn’t this because they have to pay Red for their ridiculous patent of compressed raw video?

It's also only available bundled with ProRes, although it's almost certain there's also some backroom RED RAW-racket deal going on too.

Re: DJI Mini 4 Pro

#98

Beware that DJI's software to control these craft is super sketchy to install and use. It doesn't exist in the Google Play Store, to avoid inspection.

One easy (albeit a little costly) solution here is to use the DJI Android-tablet remote (DJI RC / RC 2).

Re: DJI Mini 4 Pro

#99
post #55
post #14

Light drones are great, but how far away are we from quiet consumer drones? I'd love to not have every hike ruined by some wannabe videographer.

Should't be too far away, the commercial drones of Zipline are supposed to be super quiet. Here is video demonstrating the tech: https://youtu.be/DOWDNBu9DkU?si=_x9vSAygUSHq4ZQw&t=832

Even if they are 10x more quiet, then if there are 10 of these drones flying around we're back at square one.

Re: DJI Mini 4 Pro

#100
post #51

it would be neat to mount some sort of weather proof container on a tree with a solar panel that it could go into, so then it's like a bird. could imagine some shared spec and network of these so they can charge, lying in wait.

> lying in wait What are they waiting for?

Sounds like the setup for a Scifi novel.

"The drones lie in wait silently. The sun dips over the horizon. A lone IR led comes to life on the robots face. It is done waiting. It's prey is beckoning."

Post reply on HN