Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It’s just not your typical consumer. My only disagreement. I think many people don't know they want something better because they've never used something better. The video in the link describes how the users do short texts to get around the problem [0], including deleting whole blocks of text instead of editing. Teenagers, parents, and many others communicate heavily through texts and are often "up and down" like m…
I miss my Blackberry for typing. The tactile feedback of real keys was so much better than haptic screens.
Text editing on mobile: the invisible problem
391–400 of 693 posts
Re: Text editing on mobile: the invisible problem
#392> Text editing on mobile was considered “good enough.” Since people weren’t complaining, there was little motivation to improve it.
Put it another way, "make things better" just because they can be made better.
Re: Text editing on mobile: the invisible problem
#393Text editing involves a pop-up keyboard. Why not add a menu with arrow keys, selection toggles, and copy/cut/paste there?
Re: Text editing on mobile: the invisible problem
#394Re: Text editing on mobile: the invisible problem
#395No mention of "undo"? That's usually my biggest bug bear, no way to undo accidentally deleted/garbled edits. Oh and the fact that intended deletion of half a sentence via backspace often ends up deleting far more than intended.
Re: Text editing on mobile: the invisible problem
#396Earlier quoted context omitted.
Remember T9? I haven't much experience with it—I'm young. But it was a much more pleasant experience than the current experience with touch screen. Swiping works, but I feel it requires too much cognitive energy. As soon as a conversation is taking longer than this paragraph, I tend to call the person instead. 0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T9_(predictive_text)
T9 was so terrible I didn't use text messaging until I got my first iPhone. Actual Keyboard >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Touch screen typing >>>>>>> T9
You could literally type the message without taking the phone out of the pocket because it was extremely predictable and you knew the menu structure by the gut.
Re: Text editing on mobile: the invisible problem
#397Earlier quoted context omitted.
Remember T9? I haven't much experience with it—I'm young. But it was a much more pleasant experience than the current experience with touch screen. Swiping works, but I feel it requires too much cognitive energy. As soon as a conversation is taking longer than this paragraph, I tend to call the person instead. 0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T9_(predictive_text)
I got downvoted a lot when I mentioned missing T9 previously. It could be nostalgia, but I was pretty quick and generally accurate sending short messages. Not sure I would want to type a document on T9.
Re: Text editing on mobile: the invisible problem
#398One small thing: I don't know how it works on Android, but I used to have an N9 and then the Jolla phone and you could tap anywhere in text to place the cursor there.
iOS doesn't let you, except confusingly on the very first tap that activates the cursor. For subsequent taps, you can tap exactly where you want in the middle of a word and it always snaps the cursor to the start or end of that word.
I'm pretty good at aiming at the right character to edit even with big fingers on a small screen. Let me do it!
Re: Text editing on mobile: the invisible problem
#399This is absolutely a problem, but I'm not convinced the author has found a solution. I'd have to try it to know for sure, but from the description, it still sounds finicky. I believe touch screens are fundamentally a bad interface for productivity. Consider the range of actions provided by a mouse: You can hover without clicking, you can left click, or you can right click, all with nearly pixel-level precision. Add i…
Re: Text editing on mobile: the invisible problem
#400I can buy into the fact that text editing on phones is a pain, but the solutions presented in the video seemed very unconvincing for me. The "only magnify in place" option is obviously a horrible idea. I don't know about you but my thumb is not transparent. The whole reason for moving the magnified piece off to the side is so that you can actually see it . The problem isn't as evident in the video because there is no…
> The "only magnify in place" option is obviously a horrible idea. I don't know about you but my thumb is not transparent. I think you misunderstood the proposed solution. If you look at the video, the magnification is offset. The improvement is that the cursor is only visible in the magnification.
I don't even understand how this would work if you're dragging up (going to a previous point in the text).