Project Gutenberg has implemented one of the worst AI fears of striking actors
1–10 of 77 posts
Re: Project Gutenberg has implemented one of the worst AI fears of striking actors
#2Re: Project Gutenberg has implemented one of the worst AI fears of striking actors
#3This will help fill the gap for books that would never have an audiobook, or for people that never would have paid anyway (so they aren’t lost customers).
Re: Project Gutenberg has implemented one of the worst AI fears of striking actors
#4Listening to an audiobook narrated by an AI voice can get old after a few hours. There is absolutely still hope for traditional voice narration, especially if different voice actors want to voice different characters in the story.
We'll get there.
Re: Project Gutenberg has implemented one of the worst AI fears of striking actors
#5Listening to an audiobook narrated by an AI voice can get old after a few hours. There is absolutely still hope for traditional voice narration, especially if different voice actors want to voice different characters in the story.
Re: Project Gutenberg has implemented one of the worst AI fears of striking actors
#6[1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.03926.pdf
edit: I'm not sure what's particularly exciting about this paper otherwise, it just seems like they parsed the PG html format and then applied some previously developed speech model to them.
Re: Project Gutenberg has implemented one of the worst AI fears of striking actors
#7AI read audiobooks are unlistenable.
I’d argue that no one should be getting AI to read audiobooks it’s a terrible experience.
Re: Project Gutenberg has implemented one of the worst AI fears of striking actors
#8Spreading FUD about text-to-speech technology that is not completely lifeless is a bit like blaming google translate or OCR programs from taking away jobs. Making stuff that takes a lot of effort virtually effortless is a massive gain to humanity, especially for people who depend on technology like this to access media (especially so for media in the public domain).
It's such a weird argument that honestly it feels like a trap designed to hurt the striking actors. I hope none them are stupid enough to latch onto this article to support their argument because as an actor saying you're afraid a robot might be better at understanding and conveying the emotion in a book is not a good look. Even more so when you're aiming at accessibility software.
Re: Project Gutenberg has implemented one of the worst AI fears of striking actors
#9I personally am not a big fan of AI but playing devil’s advocate to a degree it seems AI narrated books may be useful for translating works into less common languages.
I hope we can widely implement “generated by AI” labeling for works/items to notify consumers.
Edit: fwiw I have a difficult time listening to audio books read by humans in the first place. But that’s largely irrelevant
Re: Project Gutenberg has implemented one of the worst AI fears of striking actors
#10Listening to an audiobook narrated by an AI voice can get old after a few hours. There is absolutely still hope for traditional voice narration, especially if different voice actors want to voice different characters in the story.