[flagged]
How to Roman Republic, Part IV: The Senate
11–20 of 126 posts
Re: How to Roman Republic, Part IV: The Senate
#12[flagged]
HN really needs to add "No AI generated comments" to the site rules. I'm not interested in reading AI summaries in comments here; I come for actual discussion by real people.
Re: How to Roman Republic, Part IV: The Senate
#13This is the reason I think about the Roman Empire at least once a week!
Re: How to Roman Republic, Part IV: The Senate
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
HN really needs to add "No AI generated comments" to the site rules. I'm not interested in reading AI summaries in comments here; I come for actual discussion by real people.
I don't see how a short AI summary dissuades actual discussion by real people. If anything, it can lower the barrier to entry and encourage more people to comment and participate, especially for longform pieces.
Re: How to Roman Republic, Part IV: The Senate
#15This is the reason I think about the Roman Empire at least once a week!
This has the be the funniest trend to come out of Tiktok. My SO point blank asked me how many times I thought about the roman empire and I replied "I don't know, once or twice a week". Little does she know we get a post from acoup every week! Reference (for those out of the loop): https://www.forbes.com/sites/conormurray/2023/09/18/how-ofte...
when 1/8th of the planet knows about a trend and i'm out of the loop...
Re: How to Roman Republic, Part IV: The Senate
#16This is the reason I think about the Roman Empire at least once a week!
Most people self-identifying that they think about the Roman Empire don’t seem to know the difference between the Roman Republic & Roman Empire (much less the period of Kings)…it’s all just the Roman Empire.
Re: How to Roman Republic, Part IV: The Senate
#17Ive been reading a lot because that’s about the only thing I can do so I read the original Gallic wars from Julius Cesar and its funny because he’s painted like a bad guy today for becoming a dictator but the Senate was at that point so corrupt and inefficient and everyone hated it so he wasn’t the only one trying to get rid of democracy. Julius Caesar had actually been involved in four attempted coups before he got it done. And he was popular with the public even after his death so that makes sense
I’m sure a lot of here think of the Roman Empire almost obsessively. How bad is this turn toward extrémeme censorship and surveillance? At what point do people say to hell with it and bring back kingship?
Re: How to Roman Republic, Part IV: The Senate
#18Re: How to Roman Republic, Part IV: The Senate
#19Point to Charlie Munger, whom I was critical of a few days ago, how is so much written on how the Roman Republic worked, without talking about the most basic of incentive structures that drove its citizens to work like no others in the first place - The Law of Twelve Tables? It gave every citizen property rights that were protected by the State. The system was _the_ get rich game for the common man (after Alexander r…
It's as if history rhymes.
Re: How to Roman Republic, Part IV: The Senate
#20I think I’m almost out of this illness. Still sweating the fever but no migraines Ive been reading a lot because that’s about the only thing I can do so I read the original Gallic wars from Julius Cesar and its funny because he’s painted like a bad guy today for becoming a dictator but the Senate was at that point so corrupt and inefficient and everyone hated it so he wasn’t the only one trying to get rid of democrac…
That seems to be well in progress, though I don't think anyone is actually using the term 'king' yet.