78% MNIST accuracy using GZIP in under 10 lines of code
1–10 of 141 posts
Re: 78% MNIST accuracy using GZIP in under 10 lines of code
#2Re: 78% MNIST accuracy using GZIP in under 10 lines of code
#3I wonder why you started with a code-golfed version? That seems original to the main point of the post
I like short code! It's like a joke "this is so easy, 10 loc" :)
Re: 78% MNIST accuracy using GZIP in under 10 lines of code
#4Re: 78% MNIST accuracy using GZIP in under 10 lines of code
#5I wonder why you started with a code-golfed version? That seems original to the main point of the post
original -> orthogonal? I like short code! It's like a joke "this is so easy, 10 loc" :)
I can’t count how many times I’ve looked up at a line of text to spot check it, type in a couple more letters, hit save without looking, and find later that I sound like I’m having a stroke. Never mind the times I’ve simply forgotten to look. Yes that’s a word, stop trying to replace it.
(Five minutes ago I had to type “laissez-faire” three times. Yesterday it turned “understanding” into god knows what. And if iOS doesn’t stop adding apostrophes to “its” I’m gonna fuckin lose my shit)
Re: 78% MNIST accuracy using GZIP in under 10 lines of code
#6[flagged]
Re: 78% MNIST accuracy using GZIP in under 10 lines of code
#7[flagged]
Re: 78% MNIST accuracy using GZIP in under 10 lines of code
#8For image classification, couldn't one use the residual from applying a jpeg codebook learned on a training example as metric?
Re: 78% MNIST accuracy using GZIP in under 10 lines of code
#9Re: 78% MNIST accuracy using GZIP in under 10 lines of code
#10[flagged]
Such as what?