Live data from Hacker News

Snowden leak: Cavium networking hardware may contain NSA backdoor

twitter.com

41–50 of 628 posts

Re: Snowden leak: Cavium networking hardware may contain NSA backdoor

#41
post #21

How the NSA successfully manage to prevent the Washington Post and friends from discovering and reporting on this malicious backdoor? They've been sitting on these documents for a decade. Are the journalists just that *uncurious* about the deep contents of the documents they hold exclusive access to? Was this some kind of organizational failing?

mainstream journalists are incredibly unreliable. it's absolutely clear to everyone that you cannot trust nyt and similar publications. i never read them anyway, and when I do come across articles on topics I'm knowledgeable about, i'm appalled by how wrong they are.

It's crazy to me that people pay for access to these outlets. I wouldn't pay for any content except from individual journalists and a few very small outlets, and even then, would immediately stop if things ever turn for the worse.

Re: Snowden leak: Cavium networking hardware may contain NSA backdoor

#42

How the NSA successfully manage to prevent the Washington Post and friends from discovering and reporting on this malicious backdoor? They've been sitting on these documents for a decade. Are the journalists just that *uncurious* about the deep contents of the documents they hold exclusive access to? Was this some kind of organizational failing?

Some of them are deputies for the state. State-run-media, or Media-run-state, whichever you prefer.

The FBI and CIA had agents inside Twitter and Facebook. Of course they have them inside news agencies as well. Part of it over time is access-media, the ones that play ball get the stories and info, the others get weeded out.

Re: Snowden leak: Cavium networking hardware may contain NSA backdoor

#44
post #6

The tweet seems to imply that the entire Ubiquiti Networks line of network hardware could be compromised. That's a shame; I was thinking of installing some in my house. I'm sure that Ubiquiti's customers will not be happy if they find out that the US Govt can access their private data.

Ubiquiti has many other problems besides this. The worst is their vendor lockin, where even basic network operations are not possible if you happen to have any non-ubiquiti hardware in your network. You should stay away.

Re: Snowden leak: Cavium networking hardware may contain NSA backdoor

#45
post #6

The tweet seems to imply that the entire Ubiquiti Networks line of network hardware could be compromised. That's a shame; I was thinking of installing some in my house. I'm sure that Ubiquiti's customers will not be happy if they find out that the US Govt can access their private data.

I think at this point it's pretty safe to assume that all of the well-known network hardware is compromised.

I wonder if MikroTik would be compromised- they’re Latvian and don’t necessarily have to bow to the NSA.

Re: Snowden leak: Cavium networking hardware may contain NSA backdoor

#46
More interestingly, Cavium (now Marvell) also designed and manufactured the HSMs which are used by the top cloud providers (such as AWS, GCP, possibly Azure too), to hold the most critical private keys:

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/caviums-liquidsecur...

Re: Snowden leak: Cavium networking hardware may contain NSA backdoor

#47
post #30
post #24

[flagged]

Huawei stuff is proven to be compromised, just not by NSA, instead by China.

If anything, you probably need several layers of different, non-aligned country vendors to have some Swiss cheese model security. So some Huawei stuff, somewhere, as long as it isn't only Huawei stuff.

Re: Snowden leak: Cavium networking hardware may contain NSA backdoor

#48

How the NSA successfully manage to prevent the Washington Post and friends from discovering and reporting on this malicious backdoor? They've been sitting on these documents for a decade. Are the journalists just that *uncurious* about the deep contents of the documents they hold exclusive access to? Was this some kind of organizational failing?

> Was this some kind of organizational failing?

sure, why not. and while we're on this deluded train: Julian Assange's legal problems are not political persecution

Re: Snowden leak: Cavium networking hardware may contain NSA backdoor

#49
post #21

How the NSA successfully manage to prevent the Washington Post and friends from discovering and reporting on this malicious backdoor? They've been sitting on these documents for a decade. Are the journalists just that *uncurious* about the deep contents of the documents they hold exclusive access to? Was this some kind of organizational failing?

mainstream journalists are incredibly unreliable. it's absolutely clear to everyone that you cannot trust nyt and similar publications. i never read them anyway, and when I do come across articles on topics I'm knowledgeable about, i'm appalled by how wrong they are.

>i never read them anyway, and when I do come across articles on topics I'm knowledgeable about, i'm appalled by how wrong they are.

I never do that, except when I do. What kind of soapbox are you trying to stand on. It looks more like a cardboard box collapsing under the weight of your own hubris.

I get the suspicion of news outlets of any kind. It doesn't matter what stream the journalists are fished out of, but they cannot all be subject matter experts in all subjects. This is also an expectation full of hubris on your part.

Post reply on HN