Live data from Hacker News

F-35 can’t be found after pilot ejected

thedrive.com

51–60 of 693 posts

Re: F-35 can’t be found after pilot ejected

#52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It was inop at the time: "The jet’s transponder, which usually helps locate the aircraft, was not working “for some reason that we haven’t yet determined,” said Jeremy Huggins, a spokesman at Joint Base Charleston. “So that’s why we put out the public request for help.”

Oh, someone sure is going to have to answer some tough questions. If not in purely military airspace, or combat operations, military aircraft have to be airworthy according to civil standards. That being said, no casualties, loosing a stealth fighter is somewhat funny.

If it was a two-ship, could have been only the lead had their transponder on. Keeps the ATC traffic alert systems a little happier.

Re: F-35 can’t be found after pilot ejected

#55
post #47

Have they said whether the transponder was active on the jet? They usually have the ADSB beacon live when flying near airports, but if it was turned off it would be a bit trickier to find. Also, if the retroreflector wasn't extended it might be hard for active radar to track it as well. Worst case scenario would be if it was in "full stealth" mode -- that would be the situation where we discover that NORAD air defens…

They should be able to track gross location on radar. The stealth capabilities are mostly focused on thwarting precise location and missile guidance radars.

The issue here is finding the precise crash site. General location should be known. Trying to find it under the tree canopy could be more challenging depending on how rural it is.

Re: F-35 can’t be found after pilot ejected

#58
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

F-35 > F-39 # true

I’m wondering where they get the keyboards for these; I have a IBM terminal keyboard and it only goes up to F-24.

You joke, but some people are still searching for the “Any” key.
Post reply on HN