Geographic ‘hot spots’ for cigarette and firearm deaths in the U.S.
1–10 of 145 posts
Re: Geographic ‘hot spots’ for cigarette and firearm deaths in the U.S.
#2Is it just the second and third-order effects of higher transportation costs, or is it something to do with barometric air pressure?
Re: Geographic ‘hot spots’ for cigarette and firearm deaths in the U.S.
#3Re: Geographic ‘hot spots’ for cigarette and firearm deaths in the U.S.
#4The northeast, northwest and south west seem to be doing something very right.
Re: Geographic ‘hot spots’ for cigarette and firearm deaths in the U.S.
#5Re: Geographic ‘hot spots’ for cigarette and firearm deaths in the U.S.
#6The northeast, northwest and south west seem to be doing something very right.
https://www.thetrace.org/2023/06/background-check-buy-a-gun-...
Though as the sister comment mentions, low-density settings also seem to correlate, at least for the counties outside of the South.
https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fj...
It would be nice to see multiple maps, split up by category, with an additional one for gun-related deaths (combined suicide and assault).
Re: Geographic ‘hot spots’ for cigarette and firearm deaths in the U.S.
#7Re: Geographic ‘hot spots’ for cigarette and firearm deaths in the U.S.
#8Re: Geographic ‘hot spots’ for cigarette and firearm deaths in the U.S.
#9People argue that banning it would be against "freedom"
Please explain to me how:
1) causing harm to yourself
2) causing harm to people around you
3) paying for it additional taxes(!!!)
4) and all of that while being highly addictive
... how is it a freedom?
The nature of it being addictive removes "freedom" from the consideration.
It isn't freedom when you're addicted.
I know smokers and a lot of them says that they'd want to drop this shit, but they cant.