91–100 of 140 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sounds extremely low for this kind of vulnerability of a $2.7T company that prides itself for its privacy accomplishments.
On the other hand, that's a years salary for many people. Seems like a quite fair payment, and a payout to envy. Lower, easier to get payouts are arguably better than rare jackpot payouts you have to fight over...
It's several years salary for many people.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sounds extremely low for this kind of vulnerability of a $2.7T company that prides itself for its privacy accomplishments.
How would you value this exploit, or any exploit?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sounds extremely low for this kind of vulnerability of a $2.7T company that prides itself for its privacy accomplishments.
>Sounds extremely low for this kind of vulnerability How do you know that?
Any suggestions for how I can get to anywhere close to Lina's skills? It's just mad skills.. I don't believe simply putting in huge amount of time in front of the machine is adequate. Neither is simply being smart. Is it just a combination of being smart, sinking in a lot of time, interests etc?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sounds extremely low for this kind of vulnerability of a $2.7T company that prides itself for its privacy accomplishments.
I mean, this is the company where the only security certification advertised on their website for macOS [1][2] only achieved the lowest possible level of security, EAL1. A level only fit for products where [3]: "some confidence in correct operation is required, but the threats to security are not viewed as serious" which is one level lower than "demonstrating resistance to penetration attackers with a basic attack po…
How can she do all this using kate and not vim? /s
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sounds extremely low for this kind of vulnerability of a $2.7T company that prides itself for its privacy accomplishments.
What? That's an insane amount of money
[flagged]
" Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting. " " Please don't pick the most provocative thing in an article or post to complain about in the thread. Find something interesting to respond to instead. " https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html