Live data from Hacker News

Insiders reveal problems at Upside Foods

wired.com

11–20 of 145 posts

Re: Insiders reveal problems at Upside Foods

#11
post #5

Why not just grow mushrooms? Their cells are meaty, super high in protein, and they already exist / the “tech” has already been developed! There is an extremely large selection, some with additional health benefits.

Because mushrooms are NOT "super high in protein". A comparable serving of beef has about 12x the amount of protein as mushrooms.

12x? Isn't beef approximately 2/3 protein and mushrooms 1/2 protein?

Re: Insiders reveal problems at Upside Foods

#12
post #5

Why not just grow mushrooms? Their cells are meaty, super high in protein, and they already exist / the “tech” has already been developed! There is an extremely large selection, some with additional health benefits.

There are startups doing this: https://www.naturesfynd.com/fy-protein

Re: Insiders reveal problems at Upside Foods

#13
Some kind of partial surface rotation inside a horizontal or near horizontal drum Reactor? Combine the best bits of a single surface grow and a large production run with a helical feed surface emitting sheets of the stuff?

Re: Insiders reveal problems at Upside Foods

#14
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because mushrooms are NOT "super high in protein". A comparable serving of beef has about 12x the amount of protein as mushrooms.

12x? Isn't beef approximately 2/3 protein and mushrooms 1/2 protein?

Mushrooms are about 90% water, but the non-water part is indeed roughly half protein.

Re: Insiders reveal problems at Upside Foods

#15

> Another former employee confirmed that staffers at the company would make jokes comparing Upside to Theranos. that's taking it a little far... their goal is providing an ethical food source, not revolutionizing human diagnoses can't wait for meat-less meat tech to get through its paces and take the time to mature. humans took hundreds of years to figure out how to herd cattle; what's another few years to make it in…

Yeah, I agree.

Honestly, as long as the product isn't contaminated, the consumer doesn't care if it made in roller bottles or futuristic machines. At worse they are misleading investors, but are not endangering the health of consumers.

Theranos on the other hand, actually hurt not just investors but the end consumer by promising them blood tests that did not actually work.

Re: Insiders reveal problems at Upside Foods

#16

Maybe it's just me, but I find myself having zero patience for introductions that set me up with a story. I just glanced over the first two paragraphs, rolled my eyes, and started reading at the third.

When I read a Wired article on Ars Technica, I can tell (without looking at the byline) that it’s a Wired article simply because of this.

Re: Insiders reveal problems at Upside Foods

#18
post #5

Why not just grow mushrooms? Their cells are meaty, super high in protein, and they already exist / the “tech” has already been developed! There is an extremely large selection, some with additional health benefits.

Not mushrooms but Quorn has been making meat substitute products (some quite tasty) out of vat-grown mycelium since ‘85: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quorn

Re: Insiders reveal problems at Upside Foods

#20

> Another former employee confirmed that staffers at the company would make jokes comparing Upside to Theranos. that's taking it a little far... their goal is providing an ethical food source, not revolutionizing human diagnoses can't wait for meat-less meat tech to get through its paces and take the time to mature. humans took hundreds of years to figure out how to herd cattle; what's another few years to make it in…

It's a time sensitive issue unfortunately
Post reply on HN