61–70 of 186 posts
Why you would quiz an LLM on intricacies of pop culture is beyond me. Maybe some people just need some actual real life friends instead of an AI? I almost exclusively use it for coding and technical questions and it's been doing an absolute hell of an amazing job so far!
There is an ongoing bug[1] with OpenAI's API, where it stops streaming responses after exactly 5 minutes. When I first came across the issue, I debugged it by writing a prompt along these lines: > Output every number from 1 to 10,000 in written form (e.g. "one", "two", etc.). Respond with one number per line in numeric order. As expected, the API would begin counting every number just as I asked. This would continue…
It's actually supper annoying. I keep asking it to write out entire pieces of code, instead of only things it changed, can be annoying to merge it otherwise. But nowadays it acknowledges my request "I will write complete code" and proceed to still comment out parts.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
No? If that's how sentence forming worked it would be impossible to count backwards, or count at all for that matter.
Me: Count backwards from ten GPT-4: 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 Me: Count backwards from a million to 999990 GPT-4: 1,000,000, 999,999, 999,998, 999,997, 999,996, 999,995, 999,994, 999,993, 999,992, 999,991, 999,990 I don't know about that.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's actually supper annoying. I keep asking it to write out entire pieces of code, instead of only things it changed, can be annoying to merge it otherwise. But nowadays it acknowledges my request "I will write complete code" and proceed to still comment out parts.
I think they probably finetuned that because it used to be the other way around and it was pretty bad UX to wait 1 min to apply a function change to a class or stuff like that.
It's as-if a private company had invented portal technology and used it to establish trade routes with far-off alien civilisations. They even handle the purchase order translation, currency conversion, and so on. It's a miracle! You can order room-temperature superconductors and floaty rocks at a reasonable price.
"Sorry, due to high demand, we had to cut some corners on the translations" comes the announcement.
Now the entire human race sometimes gets copper wire and ordinary rocks.
"You're still trading with the exact same aliens" is the follow-up press release to appease the angry customers.
People point at the clear evidence of almost-but-not-superconductive wire they've received and demand answers.
"No, you do not need to know anything at all about our translation technology. No, you may not visit other planets without our express approval, that might be dangerous to our prof... I mean that might be dangerous to the human race. Yes. Dangerous! Existential, even."
There is an ongoing bug[1] with OpenAI's API, where it stops streaming responses after exactly 5 minutes. When I first came across the issue, I debugged it by writing a prompt along these lines: > Output every number from 1 to 10,000 in written form (e.g. "one", "two", etc.). Respond with one number per line in numeric order. As expected, the API would begin counting every number just as I asked. This would continue…
Did you take in to account that the default GPT4 model changed in June? That would explain the response difference. You can still use the original model released in march with the GPT-4-0314 identifier.
There is an ongoing bug[1] with OpenAI's API, where it stops streaming responses after exactly 5 minutes. When I first came across the issue, I debugged it by writing a prompt along these lines: > Output every number from 1 to 10,000 in written form (e.g. "one", "two", etc.). Respond with one number per line in numeric order. As expected, the API would begin counting every number just as I asked. This would continue…
Wow, was this with the regular model (gpt-N) or a purported unchanging datestamped model like gpt-N-0314/0613?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Me: Count backwards from ten GPT-4: 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 Me: Count backwards from a million to 999990 GPT-4: 1,000,000, 999,999, 999,998, 999,997, 999,996, 999,995, 999,994, 999,993, 999,992, 999,991, 999,990 I don't know about that.
I don't know how that connects in any way to what I and the commenter preceding me wrote.