That's quite a fine for a single-country ruling, it's like 2.6% of a year of revenue — or 10 days.
[flagged]
You'd like the EU to regulate... parenting?
81–90 of 373 posts
This is a good start, but I'm going to be very curious to see if EU data law ever starts getting enforced against european companies at scale, as opposed to international companies.
On the other side, European companies are usually smaller, so their get lower fines, which won't make the headlines. Which is, why you might not hear so often about the fines against European companies, which still happen. And if we are honest, we usually only hear about the super-penalties anyway.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
€345M is a pretty huge amount of money
Especially when you consider that it was stopped 3 years ago.
It's been 7 years that every company operating in the EU knows about these rules, 3 years ago it was already 4 years into effect. There's no excuse, they broke the law, pay the fine.
This is a good start, but I'm going to be very curious to see if EU data law ever starts getting enforced against european companies at scale, as opposed to international companies.
i'm starting to feel like the EU found a business model to compensate for the fiscal tricks large companies are doing to avoid paying taxes. My only hope is that those laws won't prevent a new major high tech company to appear in the EU.
If respecting privacy prevents tech companies from forming, then we should all be celebrating when those tech companies fail to form.
This is a good start, but I'm going to be very curious to see if EU data law ever starts getting enforced against european companies at scale, as opposed to international companies.
It does get enforced against European companies, they just don't make HN headlines because they're not big-tech so nobody here would have heard of them. Also EU companies tend to be more mindful and take data protection very seriously, even before GDPR was a thing, so finding gross offenders is a rare occurrence anyway.
This is a good start, but I'm going to be very curious to see if EU data law ever starts getting enforced against european companies at scale, as opposed to international companies.
It does get enforced against European companies, they just don't make HN headlines because they're not big-tech so nobody here would have heard of them. Also EU companies tend to be more mindful and take data protection very seriously, even before GDPR was a thing, so finding gross offenders is a rare occurrence anyway.
Edit: for anyone wondering SAP has ~110,000 employees worldwide, Google has ~180,000, so comparably mega scale tech company.
Is EU the only significant power on this planet that isn't ... for a lack of better word, evil?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> we made changes to well before the investigation even began Tiktok was not compliant before 2021. Being compliant in 2022 doesn't magically end an investigation or sentence.
[flagged]
Since TikTok implemented the required changes and also (apparently) did not complain about the policies themselves (e.g. being to complicated/ambiguous to implement) it really looks like it is solely on them. They violated the law so they are to be punished accordingly.
It's like doing tax fraud in a year and then complaining that you were compliant in the following years. Penalties for this can be way beyond 2.6% of someones personal revenue. What would you say if someone complains here? Would you agree with them?