Is it new or something? This is the second time I've heard about it in 24 hours, and had never heard of it before.
Tails is a portable OS that protects against surveillance and censorship
11–20 of 192 posts
Re: Tails is a portable OS that protects against surveillance and censorship
#12Is it new or something? This is the second time I've heard about it in 24 hours, and had never heard of it before.
Re: Tails is a portable OS that protects against surveillance and censorship
#13Re: Tails is a portable OS that protects against surveillance and censorship
#14I might be wrong but I think this was a project originated by one of the branches of the US armed forces or security services? In which case, it should be pretty secure. Although, there's the obvious 'honeypot' concern. But maybe I'm thinking of another distro, that ran from RAM and didn't write anything to disk.
Re: Tails is a portable OS that protects against surveillance and censorship
#15Would be curious to hear criticisms of Tails, if anyone has opinions about it. To be clear, I'm a fan of the product -- just wondering what the other side of the story is.
Re: Tails is a portable OS that protects against surveillance and censorship
#16It seems like a growing number of things once referred to as Linux distributions are now referring to themselves as operating systems. If the kernel is Linux, and the user-space is GNU, what makes this a distinct operating system from, say, SUSE, or Arch?
Basically about all something needs to be to be called an OS is a kernel and at least one userspace program that does something useful, so I’d definitely say every ‘Linux distribution’ has always counted as an operating system in itself (so ‘Linux distribution’ is just a specific subset of ‘operating systems’).
Re: Tails is a portable OS that protects against surveillance and censorship
#17It seems like a growing number of things once referred to as Linux distributions are now referring to themselves as operating systems. If the kernel is Linux, and the user-space is GNU, what makes this a distinct operating system from, say, SUSE, or Arch?
Re: Tails is a portable OS that protects against surveillance and censorship
#18I might be wrong but I think this was a project originated by one of the branches of the US armed forces or security services? In which case, it should be pretty secure. Although, there's the obvious 'honeypot' concern. But maybe I'm thinking of another distro, that ran from RAM and didn't write anything to disk.
Re: Tails is a portable OS that protects against surveillance and censorship
#19Other related projects are whonix ( https://www.whonix.org ), which consists of two virtual machines:
A workstation to work on and a gateway, which torifies all traffic from the workstation VM.
Whonix is also integrated in Qubes OS ( https://www.qubes-os.org ), which allows you to easily work with multiple seperate whonix VMs. There is also the possibility to tunnel all internet traffic of your machine through Tor including system upgrades of the host OS itself.
Re: Tails is a portable OS that protects against surveillance and censorship
#20Would be curious to hear criticisms of Tails, if anyone has opinions about it. To be clear, I'm a fan of the product -- just wondering what the other side of the story is.