There is a misconception that consistency == usability. It's an important part of usability but there is a lot more to it. Tunnel vision on consistency (or anything really) doesn't lead to good outcomes. The big picture is what matters: can someone do what they need to do? Articles like these also have lots of opinions, no research and stats, nor have decent explanations of how much impact these "problems" actually h…
> Articles like these also have lots of opinions, no research and stats, Oh you’re in the data driven club. I bet you even A/B test. Good luck with that.
A/B testing is more for conversion optimization, it's to measure how persuasive something is.
User testing is my preferred method (in it's simplest form just observing people doing a task), if that's not an option I like heuristic evaluations.
I suggest you actually look into what usability is about, you might enjoy it. Good luck with your assumptions.