You cheap, freeloading bastards (and how not to be one).
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: You cheap, freeloading bastards (and how not to be one).
#2Re: You cheap, freeloading bastards (and how not to be one).
#3For example, the Firefox and Chrome nightlies:
http://tools.google.com/dlpage/chromesxs
A couple million hackers can help "upgrade" the Internet every day.
2) Ask/answer questions. You're making it a lot easier for the next guy.
How can I do X in Linux?
How can I do Y in Gimp?
How can I do Z in Inkscape?
Re: You cheap, freeloading bastards (and how not to be one).
#4There's really no implied reciprocity to open source, though. Humans like giving gifts. It makes the work more enjoyable.
@Droob : Yes and no, for sure, if you look at the BSD license or the MIT or whatever, there is not reciprocity implied, but if you look at the GPL, there is. If you look at that piece (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html) for example, it's pretty obvious there is a certain "brotherhood" mind implied.
But I think that even if there were no reciprocity implied, giving is more or less morally mandatory (for the bandwidth, hosting cost, etc) ...
Re: You cheap, freeloading bastards (and how not to be one).
#5There's really no implied reciprocity to open source, though. Humans like giving gifts. It makes the work more enjoyable.
Re: You cheap, freeloading bastards (and how not to be one).
#6There's really no implied reciprocity to open source, though. Humans like giving gifts. It makes the work more enjoyable.
We all do open source because we simply love it and want to give a gift, like you said. However, whenever people give me a gift, no matter how bad or good it is, I feel it's my duty to at least say "Thanks!"
Re: You cheap, freeloading bastards (and how not to be one).
#7now would i like people to contribute by way of code, money or bug reports? definitely. but they should do so because that is a gift they wish to give to the ecosystem-at-large, not out of some sense of reciprocal obligations.