61–70 of 190 posts
Let's not romanticize business too much, they want money.
The Open AI corporation is owned by a non-profit.
Let's not romanticize business too much, they want money.
Let's not romanticize business too much, they want money.
Please remind me what exactly is "Open" in this enterprise?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Open AI corporation is owned by a non-profit.
Open Ai is a cash grab that's shitting on everything the open source movement used to stand for. They have single handedly done more damage to the open source ecosystem in 4 years than Microsoft did in 40.
"A Wealth of Information produces a Poverty of Attention" The real need is an efficient allocation of Attention. That has not been solved. And is far away from being solved if you pay attention to the kind of things people pay attention too today. What is apparent is OpenAI is run by totally clueless mindlessly ambitious one dimensional buffoons.
Please remind me what exactly is "Open" in this enterprise?
> Riding with Altman, I can almost hear the ringing, ambiguous chord that opens “A Hard Day’s Night”—introducing the future. Last November, when OpenAI let loose its monster hit, ChatGPT, it triggered a tech explosion not seen since the internet burst into our lives. Suddenly the Turing test was history, search engines were endangered species, and no college essay could ever be trusted. No job was safe. No scientific…
Saying that ChatGPT sucks after trying only the free version is like saying that pizza sucks after trying only the frozen pizza because you don't want to spend $20 on a pizza in a good Italian restaurant.
I'm in the same boat - whenever I think it would be faster to use chatgpt it usually ends up being a waste of time and flow breaker. And it got worse over time. At some point a few months ago I realized I haven't used it once in a month, so why keep paying ?
Copilot is way more useful to me.