Earlier quoted context omitted.
I also have a pro account, and I’ve looked for and not seen code interpreter in my account. Am I just missing it?
You may have to go into settings and enable it under beta options.
Thank you, that worked!
ChatGPT Enterprise
451–460 of 532 posts
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#452Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The ChatGPT model has violated pretty much all open source licenses Are you claiming this because they used copyrighted material as training data? If so, I think you're starting from the wrong point. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but last I heard using copyrighted data is pretty murky waters legally and they're operating in a gray area. Additionally, I don't think many open source licenses explicitly forbid using…
US copyright/IP management is such a shitsh*w. On one hand you can get sued by patent trolls who own the patent for 'button that turns things on' or get your video delisted for recording at a mall where some copyrighted music is playing in the background, on the other hand, you get people arguing that scraping code and websites with proprietary licences is 'fair use'
To me it’s been clear for a while: copyright is a fiction which has outlived its usefulness.
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#453Earlier quoted context omitted.
everything but 32k version and 2x speed is the same as the consumer platform
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37298864 Having conversations saved to go back to like in the default setting on Pro, that's disabled when a Pro user turns on the privacy setting, is another big difference.
Would be great to be able to search them.
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#454Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#455Non-use of enterprise data for training models is table-stakes for enterprise ML products. Google does the same thing, for example. They'll want to climb the compliance ladder to be considered in more highly-regulated industries. I don't think they're quite HIPAA-compliant yet. The next thing after that is probably in-transit geofencing, so the hardware used by an institution reside in a particular jurisdiction. This…
I thought they already didn't use input data from the API to train; that it was only the consumer-facing ChatGPT product from which they'd use the data for training. It is opt-in for contributing inputs via API.
https://help.openai.com/en/articles/5722486-how-your-data-is...
That said, for enterprises that use the consumer product internally, it would make sense to pay to opt-out from that input being used.
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#456Earlier quoted context omitted.
For me that discussion is always hard to grasp. When a human would learn coding autodidacticly by reading source code, and later they would write new code — then they could only do so because they read licensed code. No one would ask for the license, right? So why do we care from where LLMs learn?
> So why do we care from where LLMs learn? Because humans dont put the "Shutterstock" watermark logo on the images they produce.
cargo cult programming is real though
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#457Earlier quoted context omitted.
> How do you prove that that could never occur? Realistically you can prove that just as well as you can prove that employees aren't using ChatGPT via their cellphones. There are also organizations that forbid the use of Stack overflow. As long as employees don't feel like you're holding back their career and skills by prohibiting them from using modern tools, and keep working there, hey. As long as you pay them enou…
Using chatgpt to code is not a skill. It’s a crutch. Any employees that feel held back by not being able to access it aren’t great in the first place.
I remember people saying literally the exact same thing almost word for word about Google almost a quarter century ago.
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#458Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can't believe the pushback I'm getting here. The use case is stunningly obvious. Companies want to dump all their Excels in it and get insights that no human could produce in any reasonable amount of time. Companies want to dump a zillion help desk tickets into and gain meaningful insights from it. Companies want to dump all their Sharepoints and Wikis into it that currently nobody can even find or manage, and finall…
>>Companies want to dump all their Excels in it and get insights that no human could produce in any reasonable amount of time. >>Companies want to dump a zillion help desk tickets into and gain meaningful insights from it. >>Companies want to dump all their Sharepoints and Wikis into it that currently nobody can even find or manage, and finally have functioning knowledge search. Mature organizations already have solu…
I wish I lived in the same universe as you
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#459Earlier quoted context omitted.
That’s where directives for enterprise contracts usually come from. I’m sure they won’t even talk to anyone not willing to pay $100k+ per year. Salesforce’s AI Cloud starts at $365k a year.
> I’m sure they won’t even talk to anyone not willing to pay $100k+ per year. Wouldn't surprise me. We had a vendor whose product we had used at relatively reasonable rates for multiple years suddenly have a pricing model change. It would have seen our cost go from $10k/yr to $100k/yr. As a small nonprofit we tried to engage them in any sort of negotiation but the response was essentially a curt "too bad." Luckily a…
A lot of times you can just ask.
We have a model that I see a lot of others do, even if they don't publicize. We have free, OSS, and cheap SaaS tiers fine for many of our academic users, and when a small group really wants the full enterprise version, we generally offer a heavily discounted pricing model to make that affordable too. The only exception here is when it is a true enterprise sale like a shared resource for a large number of users, and we'd still have to think there too.
The reason is it keeps their low budgets and thus their ROI in alignment, which is why this is pretty normal. So again, I'd recommend asking and just clarifying your are a NGO/EDU. No 100% guarantee, but should be common.