351–360 of 532 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It can, until the extension developer receives a tempting offer for it, as has happened countless times
Fork the extension and use your own then.
I thought that Microsoft was busy with enterprises yet OpenAI announces a product for enterprises. I have a feeling that the two do not get along
Explicitly calling out that they are not going to train on enterprise's data and SOC2 compliance is going to put a lot of the enterprises at ease and embrace ChatGPT in their business processes. From our discussions with enterprises (trying to sell our LLM apps platform), we quickly learned how sensitive enterprises are when it comes to sharing their data. In many of these organizations, employees are already pasting…
My company (Fortune 500 with 80,000 full time employees) has a policy that forbids the use of any AI or LLM tool. The big concern listed in the policy is that we may inadvertently use someone else’s IP from training data. So, our data going into the tool is one concern, but the other is our using something we are not authorized to use because the tool has it already in its data. How do you prove that that could never…
We won't know if this is legally sound until a company who isn't forbidding A.I. usage gets sued and they claim this as a defense. For all we know the court could determine that, as long as the content isn't directly regurgitated, it's seen as fair use of the input data.
https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2023/07/18/furthering-our-a...
Explicitly calling out that they are not going to train on enterprise's data and SOC2 compliance is going to put a lot of the enterprises at ease and embrace ChatGPT in their business processes. From our discussions with enterprises (trying to sell our LLM apps platform), we quickly learned how sensitive enterprises are when it comes to sharing their data. In many of these organizations, employees are already pasting…
My company (Fortune 500 with 80,000 full time employees) has a policy that forbids the use of any AI or LLM tool. The big concern listed in the policy is that we may inadvertently use someone else’s IP from training data. So, our data going into the tool is one concern, but the other is our using something we are not authorized to use because the tool has it already in its data. How do you prove that that could never…
There are some startups working in the space that essentially plan to do something like this. https://www.konfer.ai/aritificial-intelligence-trust-managem... is one I know of that is trying to solve this. They enable these foundation model providers to maintain an inventory of training sources so they can easily deal with coming regulations etc.
Explicitly calling out that they are not going to train on enterprise's data and SOC2 compliance is going to put a lot of the enterprises at ease and embrace ChatGPT in their business processes. From our discussions with enterprises (trying to sell our LLM apps platform), we quickly learned how sensitive enterprises are when it comes to sharing their data. In many of these organizations, employees are already pasting…
My company (Fortune 500 with 80,000 full time employees) has a policy that forbids the use of any AI or LLM tool. The big concern listed in the policy is that we may inadvertently use someone else’s IP from training data. So, our data going into the tool is one concern, but the other is our using something we are not authorized to use because the tool has it already in its data. How do you prove that that could never…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fork the extension and use your own then.
And you’re going to spend the time reviewing every single commit to make sure the dev didn’t sell out without telling anyone? Or risk running a potentially outdated and vulnerable extension?
What’s with the argumentative tone? Do you think that the replier doesn’t know this?
I bet there will be a lot more effort to build truly open-source models. Also, I wonder why no foundation has yet got involved to pool resources and create large enough models.
It feels like AI needs its own "CNCF".
"Unlimited access to advanced data analysis (formerly known as Code Interpreter)" Code Interpreter was a pretty bad name (not exactly meaningful to anyone who hasn't studied computer science), but what's the new name? "advanced data analysis" isn't a name, it's a feature in a bullet point.
What a terrible name! They should have asked ChatGPT for suggestions.