Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Enterprise

openai.com

291–300 of 532 posts

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#291

I hope no one will be disappointed, who has done a good job as an employee suddenly finding himself replaced by a snippet of code, after the weights have been sufficiently adjusted. It's like slurping the very last capital a worker has out of its mind and soul. Most companies exist to make a profit, not to employ humans. Paired with the pseudo-mocked-tech-bro self-peddling BS this announcement reads like dystopia to…

Absolutely right. We like to focus on how GenAI impacts developers here, for obvious reasons. I don't really see developers being impacted in the near-term, but the reality is that there are a lot of jobs that absolutely can go away soon, if we choose to go down that path. I wish we'd talk about those jobs more.

OpenAI loves to talk about a utopia where no one has to work and everyone is paid in Worldcoin (which of course Altman will make a handsome profit off of), but does anyone actually think that GPT-X is leading to this? Some of our most vulnerable members of society will soon find themselves without work, and no easy way to get new work. We don't need to wonder how we as a society will take care of them - all historic evidence points to us doing absolutely nothing.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#292
post #290

I hereby dub this "Baron-von-Munchausen-as-a-Service." Now you can pay real money for a chatbot to make stuff up about your company and its products. While it is pretty incredible stuff, until or unless they have a veracity bit — some sort of "please don't lie" flag in it, I'd be wary of what it produces. Will ChatGPT offer off-the-cuff pricing, discounts, rebates and refunds that are in line with your actual busines…

If you’re not reviewing ChatGPT output before utilizing it, you’re doing it wrong and will end up in hot water

100%. But people will do it wrong. A lot.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#293

Wonder if for the Enterprise version they will fix the Image Markdown Data Exfiltration vulnerability that's been known for a while. https://embracethered.com/blog/posts/2023/chatgpt-webpilot-d... Seems like a no-go for companies if an attacker can steal stuff.

can you briefly explain the vulnerability here. I'm having difficulty understanding as all I see is him recalling already previously recorded chat history of his own session. thanks.

[deleted]

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#294

Curious what the latency would be using OpenAI service vs using a hosted LLM like Llama2 on premise? GPT4 is slow and given the retrieval step (coming soon) across all of companies corpus' of data, it could be even slower as it is a sequential step. (Asking more as I am curious at this point) Another question is does the latency even matter? Today, same employees ping their colleagues for answers and wait for hours t…

I’ve found the consumer GPT4 latency to be fantastic. It seems they’re offering an improvement above this.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#295
post #290

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you’re not reviewing ChatGPT output before utilizing it, you’re doing it wrong and will end up in hot water

100%. But people will do it wrong. A lot.

Should get better over time as the tool gets better incorporated into the industry. People always misuse new tools

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#296
What I don't fundamentally understand is that ChatGPT even 4 just functions as a better Google.

It seems like there's far more ways for extensive automation by decision making via ChatGPT to cause problems than solve problems. With my experience using it for programming, anything that is non-trivial basically requires you to do it all yourself because ChatGPT will hopelessly get it wrong.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#297
post #295

Earlier quoted context omitted.

100%. But people will do it wrong. A lot.

Should get better over time as the tool gets better incorporated into the industry. People always misuse new tools

But why will it get better at accuracy if it isnt trained to be accurate?

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#298
post #295

Earlier quoted context omitted.

100%. But people will do it wrong. A lot.

Should get better over time as the tool gets better incorporated into the industry. People always misuse new tools

In such cases, I believe there are (and should be) guardrails. It already has some guardrails internally set:

ChatGPT already knows how to say: "I am not a lawyer, but I can provide you with some general information on this topic." The same thing for medicine: "I'm not a medical professional, but I can provide some general information..."

But, for instance, ask it to design a canard for a 4th generation supersonic fighter, and suddenly it spits out pages of output. [Though it finally corrects itself and balks to answer when you ask for angle of forward sweep and a formula for the curvature of the surface.]

There needs to be a way to "sniff out" if there's topics that people are getting too close to danger zones for it to answer. Ways for organizations themselves to set those 'bounding boxes.'

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#299

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> technology should empower users (for real, by giving them more control) not increase power imbalances Technology should make life easier. Automation is good.

> Technology should make life easier. A totalitarian state can make your life very comfortable with technology. Wanna trade for freedom? Automation is the best, if the majority can benefit from it.

I said nothing to support totalitarianism.

Laughable, given my political beliefs

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#300

I hereby dub this "Baron-von-Munchausen-as-a-Service." Now you can pay real money for a chatbot to make stuff up about your company and its products. While it is pretty incredible stuff, until or unless they have a veracity bit — some sort of "please don't lie" flag in it, I'd be wary of what it produces. Will ChatGPT offer off-the-cuff pricing, discounts, rebates and refunds that are in line with your actual busines…

This sounds a bit like word salad, and your argument is worse than an LLM output. You even contradict yourself at the end.

Also I think you need to better understand how much hallucination has been driven down recently and its clear path going forward.

Post reply on HN