Earlier quoted context omitted.
so that someone else gets your data? Chrome extension is a no go.
Who says it can't save it to a local database?
It can, until the extension developer receives a tempting offer for it, as has happened countless times
ChatGPT Enterprise
231–240 of 532 posts
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#232Earlier quoted context omitted.
You don't fine-tune on a corpus of documents to give the model knowledge, you use retrieval. They support uploading documents to it for that via that code interpreter, and they're adding connectors to applications where the documents live, not sure what more you're expecting.
Yes, but what if they are very large documents that exceed the maximum context size, say, a 200-page PDF? In that case won't you be forced to do some form of fine-tuning, in order to avoid a very slow/computationally expensive on-the-fly retrieval? Edit: spelling
We have >200 page PDFs at https://docalysis.com/ and there's on-the-fly retrieval. It's not more computationally expensive than something like searching one's inbox (I'd image you have more than 200 pages worth of emails in your inbox).
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#233Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also I'd heard anecdotally on the internet (Ethan Mollick's twitter I think) that 'code interpreter' was better than GPT 4 even for tasks that weren't code interpretation. Like it was more like GPT 4.5. Maybe it was an experimental preview and only enterprises are allowed to use it now. I never had access anyway.
I still have access in my $20/m non-Enterprise Pro account, though it has indeed just updated its name from Code Interpreter to Advanced Data Analysis. I haven't personally noticed it being any better than standard GPT4 even for generation of code that can't be run by it (ie non-Python code).
I also have a pro account, and I’ve looked for and not seen code interpreter in my account. Am I just missing it?
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#234What I got from this is that if I use Klarna then they'll share any related information with OpenAI. This is not what I want.
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#235You own and control your business data in ChatGPT Enterprise. We do not train on your business data or conversations, and our models don’t learn from your usage. How can we be sure of this? Just take their word for it?
How else?
If you notice that some of your confidential info made it into next generations of the model, you'll be able to sue them for big $$$ for breach of contract. That's a pretty good incentive for them not to play stupid games with that.
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#236> For all enterprise customers, it offers: > Customer prompts and company data are not used for training OpenAI models. > Unlimited access to advanced data analysis (formerly known as Code Interpreter) > 32k token context windows for 4x longer inputs, files, or follow-ups I'd thought all those had been available for non enterprise customers, but maybe I was wrong, or maybe something changed.
everything but 32k version and 2x speed is the same as the consumer platform
32k is available via API
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#237Earlier quoted context omitted.
At the bottom, in their coming soon section: "Customization: Securely extend ChatGPT’s knowledge with your company data by connecting the applications you already use"
Great now chatgpt can train on outdated documents from the 2000s, provide more confusion to new people, and give us more headaches
On the other hand, there was a lot of knowledge in those documents that effectively got lost - while the relevant tech is still underpinning half the world. For example: DCOM/COM+.
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#238I hope no one will be disappointed, who has done a good job as an employee suddenly finding himself replaced by a snippet of code, after the weights have been sufficiently adjusted.
It's like slurping the very last capital a worker has out of its mind and soul. Most companies exist to make a profit, not to employ humans.
Paired with the pseudo-mocked-tech-bro self-peddling BS this announcement reads like dystopia to me. Not that technological progress is bad, but technology should empower users (for real, by giving them more control) not increase power imbalances.
Let's see how many people who cheered today will cheer just as happily in 2028. My bet: just a few.
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#239Earlier quoted context omitted.
Haha i also thought about that Y Combinator video. Yep, their prediction didn't age well and it's becoming clear that openAI is actually a direct competitor to most of the startups that are using their api. Most "chat your own data" startups will be killed by this move.
No different than Apple, then. A lot of value is provided to customers by providing these features through a stable organization not likely to shutter within 6 months, like these startup "ChatGPT Wrappers". I hope that they are able to make a respectable sum and pivot.
I think almost each startup is focusing on enterprise as it sounds lucrative but selling to an enterprise might qualitatively offset its benefits in some way (very painful).
Personally I love what Evenup Law is doing. Basically find a segment of the market that runs like small businesses and that has a lot of repetitive tasks they have to do themselves and go to them. Though I can't really think of other segments like this :)
Re: ChatGPT Enterprise
#240I hope no one will be disappointed, who has done a good job as an employee suddenly finding himself replaced by a snippet of code, after the weights have been sufficiently adjusted. It's like slurping the very last capital a worker has out of its mind and soul. Most companies exist to make a profit, not to employ humans. Paired with the pseudo-mocked-tech-bro self-peddling BS this announcement reads like dystopia to…
> technology should empower users (for real, by giving them more control) not increase power imbalances
Technology should make life easier.
Automation is good.