> Maybe it was just my school. I figured Stanford and other top schools would be different.
Dunno about Stanford, but it's basically like that at Amherst, except for a small group of students (perhaps 10% of the student body).
A friend (former cofounder :-) and I were talking about how even though Amherst is the #1 liberal arts college in the country, there were an awful lot of dumb people in his classes. He's found that people were way smarter at his employer (a boutique management consulting firm) and now at HBS.
I had the opposite impression - I thought people were crazy smart at Amherst, and then more average, though still smart, at my employer (a financial software startup). But that was because I was in physics/CS, while he was in econ/psych. I get the feeling that many universities have internal hierarchies, where people in quantitative fields are often more driven than people in the liberal arts.