Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Enterprise

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

111–120 of 532 posts

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#111

Post by whimsicalism »

thomassmith65 wrote: post #77
whimsicalism wrote: post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can turn off history & training on your data

Note that turning 'privacy' on is buried in the UI; turning it off again requires just a single click. Such dark patterns, plus their involvement in crypto, their shoddy treatment of paying users, their security incidents... make it harder for me to feel good about OpenAI spearheading the introduction of (real) AI into the world today.

> Such dark patterns, plus their involvement in crypto, their shoddy treatment of paying users, their security incidents... make it harder for me to feel good about OpenAI spearheading the introduction of (real) AI into the world today.

Interesting. My opinion is it is a great product that works well for me, I don't find my treatment as a paying user shoddy, and their security incident gives me pause.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#112

Post by jmorgan »

judge2020 wrote: post #100
CodeCompost wrote: post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It seems to have been transferred? https://github.com/matijagrcic/azurechatgpt

If it was transferred, the /microsoft link would have redirected to it. Instead, it's the git commits re-uploaded to another repo - so the commits are the same but it didn't transfer past issues, discussions or PRs https://github.com/matijagrcic/azurechatgpt/pulls?q=

I believe it would have also kept its stars, issues and other data.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#113

Post by swores »

ftxbro wrote: post #65
simonw wrote: post #49

"Unlimited access to advanced data analysis (formerly known as Code Interpreter)" Code Interpreter was a pretty bad name (not exactly meaningful to anyone who hasn't studied computer science), but what's the new name? "advanced data analysis" isn't a name, it's a feature in a bullet point.

Also I'd heard anecdotally on the internet (Ethan Mollick's twitter I think) that 'code interpreter' was better than GPT 4 even for tasks that weren't code interpretation. Like it was more like GPT 4.5. Maybe it was an experimental preview and only enterprises are allowed to use it now. I never had access anyway.

I still have access in my $20/m non-Enterprise Pro account, though it has indeed just updated its name from Code Interpreter to Advanced Data Analysis. I haven't personally noticed it being any better than standard GPT4 even for generation of code that can't be run by it (ie non-Python code).

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#114

Post by sdesol »

vyrotek wrote: post #76

Any correlation between this and the sudden disappearance of this repo? https://github.com/microsoft/azurechatgpt Past discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37112741

All activity stopped a couple of weeks ago. It was extremely active and had close to 5 thousand stars/watch events before it was removed/made private. Unfortunately I never got around to indexing the code. You can find the insights at https://devboard.gitsense.com/microsoft/azurechatgpt

Full Disclosure: This is my tool

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#115

Post by famouswaffles »

happytiger wrote: post #105

Has there been some resolution to the copyright issues that I’m no aware of? In my conversations with execs that’s been a serious concern — basically that generated output from AI systems can’t be reliably protected. I refer to the concept that output could be deemed free of copyright because they are not created by a human author, or that derivative works can be potential liabilities because they resemble works that…

>There was the recent court decision confirming: https://www.cooley.com/news/insight/2023/2023-08-24-district...

This decision seems specifically about whether the ai itself can hold the copyright as work for hire, not whether output generated by ML models can be copyrighted.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#116

Post by zaat »

pavlov wrote: post #44
rrgok wrote: post #32

Is it really so hard for companies to provide a price range for Enterprise plan publicly on the pricing page? Why can't I, as an individual, have the same features of an Enterprise plan? What is the logic behind this practice other than profit maximization? I'm willing to pay more to have unlimited high-speed GTP4 and Longer inputs with 32k token context. EDIT: since I'm getting a lot of replies. Genuine question: ho…

> “I'm willing to pay more” How much more? That’s the question that “talk to us” enterprise pricing is trying to answer.

I'm sure that's the correct answer, and that their very best was invested in analyzing the max profit strategy (as they should).

What I'm wondering if it means that the minimal price they can offer the service with at profit, is likely to be too steep for anyone like me, who interpret "talk to us" as the online equivalent of showing him the door. The other explanation I see is that there's not many in the camp of users who react to "talk to us" button by closing the tab instead of a deal, but I find that implausible.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#117

Post by jay_kyburz »

happytiger wrote: post #105

Has there been some resolution to the copyright issues that I’m no aware of? In my conversations with execs that’s been a serious concern — basically that generated output from AI systems can’t be reliably protected. I refer to the concept that output could be deemed free of copyright because they are not created by a human author, or that derivative works can be potential liabilities because they resemble works that…

If you are concerned somebody will steal your IP or infringe your copyright, they first have to be 100% sure that some text was indeed written by an AI, and only an AI.

In practice, if you suspect something was written by an AI and are considering copying it, you would be safer to just ask an AI to write you one as well.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#118

Post by brucethemoose2 »

jmorgan wrote: post #95
vyrotek wrote: post #76

Any correlation between this and the sudden disappearance of this repo? https://github.com/microsoft/azurechatgpt Past discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37112741

Seemed like a great project. Hope to see it come back! There are some great open-source projects in this space – not quite the same – many are focused on local LLMs like Llama2 or Code Llama which was released last week: - https://github.com/jmorganca/ollama (download & run LLMs locally - I'm a maintainer) - https://github.com/simonw/llm (access LLMs from the cli - cloud and local) - https://github.com/oobabooga/text…

Also https://github.com/LostRuins/koboldcpp

The UI is relatively mature, as it predates llama. It includes upstream llama.cpp PRs, integrated AI horde support, lots of sampling tuning knobs, easy gpu/cpu offloading, and its basically dependency free.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#119

Post by brookladdy »

Pandabob wrote: post #36

This seems really cool, but I guess most companies in the EU won't dare to use this due to GDPR concerns and instead will opt-in for the Azure version, where you can choose to use GPT-models that are hosted in Azure's EU servers.

Currently, GPT-4 is not even available anymore for new customers at the only EU location they offer (France Central).
Post reply on HN