Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Enterprise

openai.com

101–110 of 532 posts

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

These enterprise deals will be $100k annually at least.

At least. I once spent months negotiating an enterprise deal that was initially quoted at $1M annually. We talked them down but it took a long time.

Wow. What type of software was it?

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#102
post #26

Interesting, but I am a bit disappointed that this release doesn't include fine-tuning on an enterprise corpus of documents. This only looks like a slightly more convenient and privacy-friendly version of ChatGPT. Or am I missing something?

Retrieval Augmented Generation would be something to check out. There was a good intro on the subject posted here a week or 3 ago.

This is one of the reasons we decided to go with Databricks. Embed all the things for RAG during ETL.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe the API (chat completions) has been private for a while now. ChatGPT (the chat application run by OpenAI on their chat models) has continued to be used for training… I believe this is why it’s such a bargain for consumers. This announcement allows businesses to let employees use ChatGPT with fewer data privacy concerns.

You can turn off history & training on your data

If you turn off history and training, you as the user can no longer see your history, and OpenAI won't train with your data. But can customer prompts and company data still be resold to data brokers?

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can turn off history & training on your data

Yes they bundled it under single dark pattern toggle so most people won’t click it.

Worse (IMO) than that is the fact that when the privacy mode is turned on, you can't access your previously saved conversations nor will it save anything you do while it's enabled. Really shitty behaviour.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#105
Has there been some resolution to the copyright issues that I’m no aware of? In my conversations with execs that’s been a serious concern — basically that generated output from AI systems can’t be reliably protected.

I refer to the concept that output could be deemed free of copyright because they are not created by a human author, or that derivative works can be potential liabilities because they resemble works that were used for training data or whatnot (and we have no idea what was really used to train).

There was the recent court decision confirming:

https://www.cooley.com/news/insight/2023/2023-08-24-district...

Seems odd to start making AI systems a data-at-the-center-of-the-company technology when such basic issues exist.

Is this not a concern anymore?

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#106
post #2

> For all enterprise customers, it offers: > Customer prompts and company data are not used for training OpenAI models. > Unlimited access to advanced data analysis (formerly known as Code Interpreter) > 32k token context windows for 4x longer inputs, files, or follow-ups I'd thought all those had been available for non enterprise customers, but maybe I was wrong, or maybe something changed.

everything but 32k version and 2x speed is the same as the consumer platform

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37298864

Having conversations saved to go back to like in the default setting on Pro, that's disabled when a Pro user turns on the privacy setting, is another big difference.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#107

Has there been some resolution to the copyright issues that I’m no aware of? In my conversations with execs that’s been a serious concern — basically that generated output from AI systems can’t be reliably protected. I refer to the concept that output could be deemed free of copyright because they are not created by a human author, or that derivative works can be potential liabilities because they resemble works that…

We know that stuff generated from AI content is generally not your copyright, but there isn't any current ruling on whether or not you're free to use copyright-protected content to train a model in a legal way (e.g. fair use since it's been 'learned on', not directly copied). Some companies are using OpenAI gpt stuff, which is almost certainly trained on tons of copyrighted content and academic content, while other companies are being more cautious and soliciting models specifically trained on public domain/licensed content.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#108
post #2

> For all enterprise customers, it offers: > Customer prompts and company data are not used for training OpenAI models. > Unlimited access to advanced data analysis (formerly known as Code Interpreter) > 32k token context windows for 4x longer inputs, files, or follow-ups I'd thought all those had been available for non enterprise customers, but maybe I was wrong, or maybe something changed.

> Customer prompts and company data are not used for training OpenAI models. This is borderline extortion, and it's hilarious to witness as someone who doesn't have a dog in this fight.

Not really, they want some users to give them conversation history for training purposes and offer cheaper access to people willing to provide that.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#109
post #3

Seems like they are quite startled with LLama 2 and Code Llama, and how its rapid adoption is accelerating the AI race to zero. Why have this when Llama 2 and Code Llama exists and brings the cost close to $0? This sound like a huge waste of money for something that should just be completely on-device or self-hosted if you don't trust cloud-based AI models like ChatGPT Enterprise and want it all private and low cost.…

If you could offer stable 70B llama API at half the price of ChatGPT API I would pay for it. I know HN likes to believe everything is close to $0, but it is hardly the case.

(Not affiliated) https://together.ai/pricing

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#110
post #95
post #76

Any correlation between this and the sudden disappearance of this repo? https://github.com/microsoft/azurechatgpt Past discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37112741

Seemed like a great project. Hope to see it come back! There are some great open-source projects in this space – not quite the same – many are focused on local LLMs like Llama2 or Code Llama which was released last week: - https://github.com/jmorganca/ollama (download & run LLMs locally - I'm a maintainer) - https://github.com/simonw/llm (access LLMs from the cli - cloud and local) - https://github.com/oobabooga/text…

Adding to the list:

- https://github.com/trypromptly/LLMStack (build and run apps locally with LocalAI support - I'm a maintainer)

Post reply on HN