Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Enterprise

openai.com

51–60 of 532 posts

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#52
post #32

Is it really so hard for companies to provide a price range for Enterprise plan publicly on the pricing page? Why can't I, as an individual, have the same features of an Enterprise plan? What is the logic behind this practice other than profit maximization? I'm willing to pay more to have unlimited high-speed GTP4 and Longer inputs with 32k token context. EDIT: since I'm getting a lot of replies. Genuine question: ho…

Because the truth is, each deal is custom packaged and priced for each enterprise. It's all negotiated pricing. Call it "value pricing" or whatever you want, prices are set at the tolerance level of each company. A price-sensitive enterprise might pay $50k while another company won't blink at $80k for essentially the same services.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#53
post #44
post #32

Is it really so hard for companies to provide a price range for Enterprise plan publicly on the pricing page? Why can't I, as an individual, have the same features of an Enterprise plan? What is the logic behind this practice other than profit maximization? I'm willing to pay more to have unlimited high-speed GTP4 and Longer inputs with 32k token context. EDIT: since I'm getting a lot of replies. Genuine question: ho…

> “I'm willing to pay more” How much more? That’s the question that “talk to us” enterprise pricing is trying to answer.

This is really well put!

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#54
post #3

Seems like they are quite startled with LLama 2 and Code Llama, and how its rapid adoption is accelerating the AI race to zero. Why have this when Llama 2 and Code Llama exists and brings the cost close to $0? This sound like a huge waste of money for something that should just be completely on-device or self-hosted if you don't trust cloud-based AI models like ChatGPT Enterprise and want it all private and low cost.…

Less technical companies throw money at problems to solve them. Like mine, sadly... Even if it takes a small amount of effort, companies will throw money for zero effort.

why should they solve it? if it's not a core competency, just buy it.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#55
post #37

I used to be super hyped about ChatGPT and the productivity they could deliver. However the large amount of persistent bugs in their interface has convinced me otherwise.

Bugs in the interface?

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#56
post #32

Is it really so hard for companies to provide a price range for Enterprise plan publicly on the pricing page? Why can't I, as an individual, have the same features of an Enterprise plan? What is the logic behind this practice other than profit maximization? I'm willing to pay more to have unlimited high-speed GTP4 and Longer inputs with 32k token context. EDIT: since I'm getting a lot of replies. Genuine question: ho…

they should just create another consumer tier with those. there shouldn't be a need for individuals to want the Enterprise plan.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#58

This seems really cool, but I guess most companies in the EU won't dare to use this due to GDPR concerns and instead will opt-in for the Azure version, where you can choose to use GPT-models that are hosted in Azure's EU servers.

I'd be surprised if OpenAI didn't offer "and we'll run it on EU servers for you, too" as part of a $1m+ deal.

Surprising it didn't make the initial launch announcement though.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#59
post #26

Interesting, but I am a bit disappointed that this release doesn't include fine-tuning on an enterprise corpus of documents. This only looks like a slightly more convenient and privacy-friendly version of ChatGPT. Or am I missing something?

At the bottom, in their coming soon section: "Customization: Securely extend ChatGPT’s knowledge with your company data by connecting the applications you already use"

I saw it, but it only mentions "applications" (whatever that means) and not bare documents. Does this mean companies might be able to upload, say, PDFs, and fine-tune the model on that?
Post reply on HN