Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Enterprise

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–20 of 532 posts

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#11

Post by rangledangle »

rvz wrote: post #3

Seems like they are quite startled with LLama 2 and Code Llama, and how its rapid adoption is accelerating the AI race to zero. Why have this when Llama 2 and Code Llama exists and brings the cost close to $0? This sound like a huge waste of money for something that should just be completely on-device or self-hosted if you don't trust cloud-based AI models like ChatGPT Enterprise and want it all private and low cost.…

Less technical companies throw money at problems to solve them. Like mine, sadly... Even if it takes a small amount of effort, companies will throw money for zero effort.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#12

Post by ftxbro »

brabel wrote: post #10
ftxbro wrote: post #2

> For all enterprise customers, it offers: > Customer prompts and company data are not used for training OpenAI models. > Unlimited access to advanced data analysis (formerly known as Code Interpreter) > 32k token context windows for 4x longer inputs, files, or follow-ups I'd thought all those had been available for non enterprise customers, but maybe I was wrong, or maybe something changed.

I think the real feature is this: " We do not train on your business data or conversations, and our models don’t learn from your usage. ChatGPT Enterprise is also SOC 2 compliant and all conversations are encrypted in transit and at rest. "

Which part of that is new, because I was pretty sure they were saying "we do not train on your business data or conversations, and our models don’t learn from your usage" already. Maybe the SOC 2 and encryption is new?

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#13

Post by cowthulhu »

ftxbro wrote: post #2

> For all enterprise customers, it offers: > Customer prompts and company data are not used for training OpenAI models. > Unlimited access to advanced data analysis (formerly known as Code Interpreter) > 32k token context windows for 4x longer inputs, files, or follow-ups I'd thought all those had been available for non enterprise customers, but maybe I was wrong, or maybe something changed.

I believe the API (chat completions) has been private for a while now. ChatGPT (the chat application run by OpenAI on their chat models) has continued to be used for training… I believe this is why it’s such a bargain for consumers. This announcement allows businesses to let employees use ChatGPT with fewer data privacy concerns.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#14

Post by BoorishBears »

ftxbro wrote: post #2

> For all enterprise customers, it offers: > Customer prompts and company data are not used for training OpenAI models. > Unlimited access to advanced data analysis (formerly known as Code Interpreter) > 32k token context windows for 4x longer inputs, files, or follow-ups I'd thought all those had been available for non enterprise customers, but maybe I was wrong, or maybe something changed.

It is pretty much is if you use OpenAI via Azure, or you're large enough and talk to their sales (the 2x faster is dedicated capacity I'm guessing)

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#15

Post by vidarh »

ftxbro wrote: post #12
brabel wrote: post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the real feature is this: " We do not train on your business data or conversations, and our models don’t learn from your usage. ChatGPT Enterprise is also SOC 2 compliant and all conversations are encrypted in transit and at rest. "

Which part of that is new, because I was pretty sure they were saying "we do not train on your business data or conversations, and our models don’t learn from your usage" already. Maybe the SOC 2 and encryption is new?

They don't train on data when you either use the API or disable chat history, which is inconvenient.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#16

Post by make3 »

rvz wrote: post #3

Seems like they are quite startled with LLama 2 and Code Llama, and how its rapid adoption is accelerating the AI race to zero. Why have this when Llama 2 and Code Llama exists and brings the cost close to $0? This sound like a huge waste of money for something that should just be completely on-device or self-hosted if you don't trust cloud-based AI models like ChatGPT Enterprise and want it all private and low cost.…

I'm really not sure at all this can be interpreted as them being startled at LLama 2 at all.

From the very beginning everyone knew data privacy & security would be one of the main issues for corporations.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#17

Post by willsmith72 »

rvz wrote: post #3

Seems like they are quite startled with LLama 2 and Code Llama, and how its rapid adoption is accelerating the AI race to zero. Why have this when Llama 2 and Code Llama exists and brings the cost close to $0? This sound like a huge waste of money for something that should just be completely on-device or self-hosted if you don't trust cloud-based AI models like ChatGPT Enterprise and want it all private and low cost.…

most teams don't want to self-host, and definitely don't want to have to run on-device eating up their ram

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#18

Post by runnerup »

rangledangle wrote: post #11
rvz wrote: post #3

Seems like they are quite startled with LLama 2 and Code Llama, and how its rapid adoption is accelerating the AI race to zero. Why have this when Llama 2 and Code Llama exists and brings the cost close to $0? This sound like a huge waste of money for something that should just be completely on-device or self-hosted if you don't trust cloud-based AI models like ChatGPT Enterprise and want it all private and low cost.…

Less technical companies throw money at problems to solve them. Like mine, sadly... Even if it takes a small amount of effort, companies will throw money for zero effort.

Zero execution risk, rather than zero effort. There’s always a 10% chance that implementation goes on forever and spending some money eliminates that risk.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#19

Post by anonyfox »

saliagato wrote: post #4

I thought that Microsoft was busy with enterprises yet OpenAI announces a product for enterprises. I have a feeling that the two do not get along

Or maybe they got urged to offset more operational costs - and I would believe that companies already paying for Microsoft things Wille happily pay for OpenAI in addition just to be safe.

Re: ChatGPT Enterprise

#20

Post by sebzim4500 »

rvz wrote: post #3

Seems like they are quite startled with LLama 2 and Code Llama, and how its rapid adoption is accelerating the AI race to zero. Why have this when Llama 2 and Code Llama exists and brings the cost close to $0? This sound like a huge waste of money for something that should just be completely on-device or self-hosted if you don't trust cloud-based AI models like ChatGPT Enterprise and want it all private and low cost.…

Llama 2 is nowhere near the capability of GPT-4 for general purpose tasks
Post reply on HN