Earlier quoted context omitted.
In fairness, internal combustion engines are an inefficient use of resources. They just happen to be the best option. It is basically impossible to design an organisation that directs resources to economically unproductive people. $700 / $3,000 going to the right spot could be reasonably effective. I mean, at least the Red Cross won't take a fraction of the money and use it to fund ruinous, murderous and pointless ra…
Spending only $700 out of $3000 on the stated mission is doing a decent job, since when?
Running blood drives is a major part of their mission, it’s also largely self sustaining because they are selling the blood.