Live data from Hacker News

IBM analog AI chip could give the Nvidia H100 a run for its money

techradar.com

11–20 of 71 posts

Re: IBM analog AI chip could give the Nvidia H100 a run for its money

#11

"can model up to 17 million parameters" So about about 1000x away from being useful? Most current models are billions not millions.

Neuromorphic hardware is more about action potentials per unit time than raw parameter count.

Re: IBM analog AI chip could give the Nvidia H100 a run for its money

#13
post #11

"can model up to 17 million parameters" So about about 1000x away from being useful? Most current models are billions not millions.

Neuromorphic hardware is more about action potentials per unit time than raw parameter count.

ELI5 Please

Re: IBM analog AI chip could give the Nvidia H100 a run for its money

#14
post #11

"can model up to 17 million parameters" So about about 1000x away from being useful? Most current models are billions not millions.

Neuromorphic hardware is more about action potentials per unit time than raw parameter count.

But unless it can directly or indirectly support current transformer architectures (with their huge parameter counts), it's going to critically struggle with adoption.

Re: IBM analog AI chip could give the Nvidia H100 a run for its money

#16
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Neuromorphic hardware is more about action potentials per unit time than raw parameter count.

But unless it can directly or indirectly support current transformer architectures (with their huge parameter counts), it's going to critically struggle with adoption.

Why can't we develop different architectures?

Re: IBM analog AI chip could give the Nvidia H100 a run for its money

#17
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Neuromorphic hardware is more about action potentials per unit time than raw parameter count.

ELI5 Please

I'd start with the wikipedia article on spiking neural networks.

Re: IBM analog AI chip could give the Nvidia H100 a run for its money

#18

And how about implementing this directly on the camera sensor? Before the A/D conversion.

Arguably that is what the Foveon sensor did.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foveon_X3_sensor

There is a book called The Silicon Eye about the history, and not coincidentally Carver Mead also wrote a book on neuromorphic analog neural network implementation back in the 80s.

Re: IBM analog AI chip could give the Nvidia H100 a run for its money

#19
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But unless it can directly or indirectly support current transformer architectures (with their huge parameter counts), it's going to critically struggle with adoption.

Why can't we develop different architectures?

Well, show me one.

Re: IBM analog AI chip could give the Nvidia H100 a run for its money

#20

And how about implementing this directly on the camera sensor? Before the A/D conversion.

Arguably that is what the Foveon sensor did. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foveon_X3_sensor There is a book called The Silicon Eye about the history, and not coincidentally Carver Mead also wrote a book on neuromorphic analog neural network implementation back in the 80s.

Hmm all I've seen about Foveon is just stacked RGB sensing. Ie there is no computation involving multiple pixels or anything like that.
Post reply on HN