The key sentence here is: > This is the fundamental difference between the Mac (a platform that basically lets developers and users do anything they want) and the iPad (where if Apple doesn’t specifically allow it, it can’t be done). Apple (since Lisa/Mac, after Apple II, which had an open architecture) likes appliances and to control the user experience, so the iPad is "more Apple" than Macs are. Whenever I am waiti…
Giving up the iPad-only travel dream
401–410 of 630 posts
Re: Giving up the iPad-only travel dream
#402I have an iPad Pro 12.9 with the magic keyboard as a device that's not purely for work but honestly, it's been collecting dust and I use it perhaps once a week to read news on the couch. It's pretty much a glorified note taker, a way to browse pictures/videos on a bigger screen, and respond to non-serious emails. For what I'm using, I don't think it's worth the $999+ price point.
Re: Giving up the iPad-only travel dream
#403Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why? Having xcode usable just with (their 350€+) keyboard seems perfectly acceptable.
For the same reason they deliberately made iphone apps look bad -- they want applications designed to work with the device to make it a good experience and not applications designed for something else shoehorned in. I see some real wisdom in this approach considering how poor some of the alternative experiences are. Ultimately why would you buy it if it's just an inferior laptop with a touchscreen that you can detach…
For the same reason you carry an "inferior" camera, pda, navigation system, cellphone with very short battery life and undersized movie screen: a smartphone does all that okay-ishly. Or why ultrabooks are vastly more popular than gaming laptops. Convenience and form factor trump "inferior" all the time.
Re: Giving up the iPad-only travel dream
#404The key sentence here is: > This is the fundamental difference between the Mac (a platform that basically lets developers and users do anything they want) and the iPad (where if Apple doesn’t specifically allow it, it can’t be done). Apple (since Lisa/Mac, after Apple II, which had an open architecture) likes appliances and to control the user experience, so the iPad is "more Apple" than Macs are. Whenever I am waiti…
Myself, I've always seen the iPad as a "media consumption device" (despite the amazing Procreate) and never bothered to try to shoehorn it into another role.
My laptop and desktops will remain my primary devices forever I suspect.
Re: Giving up the iPad-only travel dream
#405The key sentence here is: > This is the fundamental difference between the Mac (a platform that basically lets developers and users do anything they want) and the iPad (where if Apple doesn’t specifically allow it, it can’t be done). Apple (since Lisa/Mac, after Apple II, which had an open architecture) likes appliances and to control the user experience, so the iPad is "more Apple" than Macs are. Whenever I am waiti…
Nitpick, but I've been using the same usb-c charger for years. Soon they can all share the same cable.
Re: Giving up the iPad-only travel dream
#406Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do-it-all devices tend to not really satisfy in anything. I got a Lenovo Yoga that was meant to be “convertible” between laptop and tablet and I never really did use it anywhere near as much as the technically much less powerful iPad Air I bought after.
I keep old Yoga 13 in a drawer. I think it happened still too early for its time - too heavy as tablet, fans, small screen vs form factor, font hinting quite bad in vertical mode, Windows8 clunky interface, battery... I think today's Macbook Air M2 with 360deg hinges, touch and some iPad like UI-mode would be a holy grail for the article author.
Re: Giving up the iPad-only travel dream
#407The key sentence here is: > This is the fundamental difference between the Mac (a platform that basically lets developers and users do anything they want) and the iPad (where if Apple doesn’t specifically allow it, it can’t be done). Apple (since Lisa/Mac, after Apple II, which had an open architecture) likes appliances and to control the user experience, so the iPad is "more Apple" than Macs are. Whenever I am waiti…
Personal computers started open, the iPad started as closed. The author is trying to get the twain to meet. Myself, I've always seen the iPad as a "media consumption device" (despite the amazing Procreate) and never bothered to try to shoehorn it into another role. My laptop and desktops will remain my primary devices forever I suspect.
This is a white flag in Apple community parlance, not a plea.
Re: Giving up the iPad-only travel dream
#408Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It’s a terrible shame because I think there really is value in a computer that fills the space between a phone and a “real” computer. Apple has the technical capability to make a Macbook that is separable. The screen comes off and makes an iPad. It also has the technical capability to make a bi-modal OS. OSX with a HW toggle switch that allows OSX/iPadOS modes. The switch could be nearly seamless. The unlimited fre…
To be fair Microsoft has their own version of an iPad that converts into a laptop and it doesn’t work that well from what I heard.
1) top heavy, because all the hardware is on the screen portion, so it's difficult to balance and use it on your lap
2) lack of processing power due to the form factor and thermal limitations
3) lack of touch friendly windows apps that can make it truly useful as a tablet
1 probably can't be helped, but 2 and 3 should definitely be better now especially since Apple silicon and iOS exist, if they choose to make something like this...
Re: Giving up the iPad-only travel dream
#409Most people’s computing life is Office-style docs, emails, browsing, and social media. The iPad is great at doing those things.
If your default mode of computing insists on having a host of windows open that you, after years or decades of experience, can fly through like a hacker god in a movie, then yeah, you may find the experience limiting. That’s when you start wondering if it’s worth the trade offs.
For me personally? Yeah, on short personal trips, I go with the iPad alone. I can do everything I need to do personally with it, and if I need to reach out and do some work tasks, it’s still possible. (Not for nothing, my photo workflow now runs through the iPad first, which further enables no-laptop vacation travel.)
What do I get for making the tradeoff? I carry a far cheaper and lighter device with better battery life, and one which is also better suited to reading or video consumption (IMO) than a full laptop.
Re: Giving up the iPad-only travel dream
#410Earlier quoted context omitted.
Only Apple iPads or are you using the term generically? I'm guessing you're in London or another major city? Similar to the parent I only ever see iPads in two places, the hands of rich kids in restaurants, and in primary schools.
In the UK you basically only see iPads (95%+). Android tablets aren’t common