You could do two births at once, so you have a good counterweight.
But, why stop at two? This is a software engineer dream: Perfectly linear scalability
Apparatus for facilitating the birth of a child by centrifugal force (1963)
51–60 of 230 posts
Re: Apparatus for facilitating the birth of a child by centrifugal force (1963)
#52Re: Apparatus for facilitating the birth of a child by centrifugal force (1963)
#53Everybody is joking half sarcastically here but childbirth as a process in hospitals do have serious problems and modern day labour leaves deep mental scars in most women while being one of the most important thing in their life. This is definitely a step in the wrong direction however laughable the idea is. Do you know what is the most uncomfortable position for labour is? Yeah, layin on your back. It's just the mos…
>Do you know what is the most uncomfortable position for labour is? Yeah, layin on your back.
My wife and I were shocked when we had our first. We were recommended a "natural birth" course that taught us this, and everyone gave us crap about being "woo-woo" and "denying science".
Everyone.
We also had to forcibly tell doctors "no" to forceps, pumps, drugs, and all the interventions. They made such a big deal about being two days past the due date, that they pulled her aside and asked if I was abusive.
The birth of our first was not too difficult (her words), she did it her way, listened to his she was feeling, followed her gut, and I just had to run interference.
Doctors and nurses make a big deal about things like "the cord is wrapped around the neck" when the baby isn't even using its throat to breathe yet. It still has the cord for everything they need.
Now we're having a second and we're gonna go home birth. The morphology scans can't seem to decide if we're at 18 weeks or 19 weeks. Due dates my ass.
Re: Apparatus for facilitating the birth of a child by centrifugal force (1963)
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
I do not think it is appropriate to imply non western people are "less civilized" or call them "primitive". Also, the part about "civilized Women who often do not have the opportunity to develop the muscles needed in confinement" is simply untrue today. We all have tons of opportunities to develop whatever muscles we desire to develop. We just need to take those opportunities. Note that western people, including wome…
Running 10k a day is definitely not the norm, most people don't even walk 10k a day. Even then, sitting 8h a day in front of a computer is a quite modern plague and the root cause of most "back pain" issues (an insanely prevalent issue, even just counting medically reported cases) because of core atrophy.
Re: Apparatus for facilitating the birth of a child by centrifugal force (1963)
#55Re: Apparatus for facilitating the birth of a child by centrifugal force (1963)
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Say what you mean. If you mean with some weak or atrophied muscles, say that. Don't use "civilized" to hide that fact because it means someone in good shape would be "primitive". Which means not only the choice of words is in fact classist/colonialist, it is also not a very logical statement (sorta fine on HN but sorta bad for a scientific paper). But yeah, times were different (as a statement of fact, no sarcasm).
Re: Apparatus for facilitating the birth of a child by centrifugal force (1963)
#57Everybody is joking half sarcastically here but childbirth as a process in hospitals do have serious problems and modern day labour leaves deep mental scars in most women while being one of the most important thing in their life. This is definitely a step in the wrong direction however laughable the idea is. Do you know what is the most uncomfortable position for labour is? Yeah, layin on your back. It's just the mos…
Re: Apparatus for facilitating the birth of a child by centrifugal force (1963)
#58Re: Apparatus for facilitating the birth of a child by centrifugal force (1963)
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
I do not think it is appropriate to imply non western people are "less civilized" or call them "primitive". Also, the part about "civilized Women who often do not have the opportunity to develop the muscles needed in confinement" is simply untrue today. We all have tons of opportunities to develop whatever muscles we desire to develop. We just need to take those opportunities. Note that western people, including wome…
[flagged]
Re: Apparatus for facilitating the birth of a child by centrifugal force (1963)
#60Everybody is joking half sarcastically here but childbirth as a process in hospitals do have serious problems and modern day labour leaves deep mental scars in most women while being one of the most important thing in their life. This is definitely a step in the wrong direction however laughable the idea is. Do you know what is the most uncomfortable position for labour is? Yeah, layin on your back. It's just the mos…