Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can imagine that this is a HN-bubble thing. Most people would probably get bored from just seeing some live footage.
Nope. Same reaction from a wide variety of people including my wife who's not in tech and doesn't know what HN or YCombinator are. She was like "let the team speak already!"
Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]
211–220 of 542 posts
Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]
#212Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Why such a long political speech ISRO is primary arm of the Department of Space which is headed by the Prime Minister. So in essence, the Prime Minister is the boss. It is not an independent federal agency like NASA.
If my understanding is correct, did the PM in his speech promise to fund a future mission to Saturn?
Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]
#213Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]
#214Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]
#215Scott Manly has a video on why he thinks the last one failed. It sounds like their landing software didn't have "oh crap, we're way off course, just land wherever". It only had the happy path of "fly to here and land", so when it switched to the landing phase it tried valiently (including flying upside down) to try to fly back to the landing zone, but the landing zone was much further than fuel supplies allowed. Hope…
Not considering such a basic error condition seems like a gross omission. This can't even come from the software engineering, but must be some kind of managerial failure (e.g. we're short on time, but have to report great progress to my boss, so skip this scenario).
Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]
#216It’s landed! Congratulations to India on this great achievement!
Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]
#217Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]
#218Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]
#219Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]
#220Scott Manly has a video on why he thinks the last one failed. It sounds like their landing software didn't have "oh crap, we're way off course, just land wherever". It only had the happy path of "fly to here and land", so when it switched to the landing phase it tried valiently (including flying upside down) to try to fly back to the landing zone, but the landing zone was much further than fuel supplies allowed. Hope…
This applies to general software development but is especially true in this case While we think "this cannot ever happen" in a lot of cases it can, in ways you did not consider. Both for good and bad
Turns out it just flew over a cliff edge that actually does that. Completely by accident.