Live data from Hacker News

New York Times considers legal action against OpenAI as copyright tensions swirl

npr.org

381–383 of 383 posts

Re: New York Times considers legal action against OpenAI as copyright tensions swirl

#381
"I'll keep saying it every time this comes up.

I LOVE being told by techbros that a human painstaking studying one thing at a time, and not memorizing verbatin but rather taking away the core concept, is exactly the same type of "learning" that a model does when it takes in millions of things at once and can spit out copyrighted writing verbatim."

Personally I think they argue that way because they get off on being contrarian out of spite, but to me it's just a signal of maliciousness and stupidity all at once.

Re: New York Times considers legal action against OpenAI as copyright tensions swirl

#382
post #222

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unfortunately we'll have 9 justices who know little about copyright law and nothing about tech to tell us what the law really is.

They will be significantly assisted by Supreme Court clerks, who are generally recent graduates (2-4 years) of the top law schools in the US. Your stereotypes of uninformed Congressmen from televised Congressional hearings don't really apply here.

26 year old law school grads will help! Oh, I stand "corrected." LOL

Re: New York Times considers legal action against OpenAI as copyright tensions swirl

#383

Don't humans operate similarly? We gain knowledge through experiences. These AI models effectively condense a vast amount of experience data into weights. Considering the global race in AI advancements, I'm skeptical about the success of these copyright claims. I do find it hypocritical that OpenAI says that other LLMs can't be trained on data generated by their LLMs.

You don't think perfect recall and sheer scale make this apples to pumpkins? What a disingenuous argument.
Post reply on HN