Earlier quoted context omitted.
Non-nitro users can stream in 1080p60, all they have to do is join a "boosted" server. Which is very easy to do - you can find tons of freely joinable 'official' servers for games, which are boosted, and then join one of the available voice channels.
>all they have to do is join a "boosted" server. I didn't think of this thank you! I wanted to stream in my friend's server for my friends to watch but his server isn't boosted, but now I'm gonna join a random server and stream for strangers instead!
Unlocking Discord Nitro features for free
101–110 of 145 posts
Re: Unlocking Discord Nitro features for free
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean cracker in the current sense of the world. And he did the equivalent of inspect element. It was clever, but no real harms were done to any parties.
From a legal perspective you could argue that he is cracking a software, and sharing the crack, and the result is potential revenue loss for Discord
Re: Unlocking Discord Nitro features for free
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
There’s issue with metadata & the requirement of sharing one’s address book to use WhatsApp. I wouldn’t be surprised if it too like Signal required users have a Android/iOS primary device & a phone number or you can’t use the service which has privacy implications but also feeds the mobile OS duopoly as you can’t choose another OS (or to just not have a phone).
You can use WhatsApp without sharing the address book by using wa.me links instead (e. g. wa.me/+12345556789) to start chats. Still sucks though.
Re: Unlocking Discord Nitro features for free
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
Matrix isn't better than Discord on that aspect. There are the anime communities already, so it's not just about projects. Also, on Discord, you can have pretty serious discussions and organise your projects. But it's never done in #general : you need to create specific rooms where users focus. The shoutout function is at the heart of the group on Discord. But Discord won users in the first place by allowing them to…
And Matrix is currently too heavy to self-host which means relying on Matrix.org (who also controls the spec). My vote would be an XMPP MUC that’s bridged to IRC. This keeps it lightweight & decentralized. Both of these options could be ran with hundreds or thousands of users on a potato compared to Matrix.
I have no experience with Synapse which was apparently quite the hog as far as I know, but Dendrite is quite lean it seems
Re: Unlocking Discord Nitro features for free
#105Currently, Discord doesn’t appear to validate on their servers whether the stream being transmitted truly adheres to the criteria of a non-subscribed user I wonder who thought that would be a good implementation. Client-side validation seems like a very novice mistake.
> I wonder who thought that would be a good implementation. Client-side validation seems like a very novice mistake. As someone who only sends up PRs containing complete features in their final state implemented exactly as I hoped, I have no idea. Unrelated aside: just started my fifth new job this month. I never seem to jibe with project managers.
Re: Unlocking Discord Nitro features for free
#106I use Discord all the time, but I have seen zero reason to get Nitro. Every time they try to upsell it to me the "features" are unnecessary. The marque feature either "50MB uploads" (Nitro Basic) or "500MB uploads" (Nitro). Is this per file, per day, per month??? I only share the occasional screenshot or small file, so uploads have never been an issue. The rest of the "benefits" - "server boosts", custom Emoji, or a…
I like my custom emoji, that's about it. >The marque feature either "50MB uploads" (Nitro Basic) or "500MB uploads" (Nitro). Is this per file, per day, per month? Per-file upload limit, it used to be 8 MiB until april which made it worth paying nitro for some.
Re: Unlocking Discord Nitro features for free
#107Currently, Discord doesn’t appear to validate on their servers whether the stream being transmitted truly adheres to the criteria of a non-subscribed user I wonder who thought that would be a good implementation. Client-side validation seems like a very novice mistake.
We're talking bandwidth here.
Checking for upload is not the issue imo, the issue is that you can watch a 1080p stream a non nytro user, if you don't check it at the upload stage then you should make sure that people can only watch 720p streams.
Re: Unlocking Discord Nitro features for free
#108Re: Unlocking Discord Nitro features for free
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are even people like me, who have Nitro and still use modded client for different reasons.
Being able to delete your previous messages in bulk is a very good reason for example, it's borderline (or completely ?) illegal to threaten users to ban them if they choose to use their right to mass-delete their previous messages.
Re: Unlocking Discord Nitro features for free
#110Currently, Discord doesn’t appear to validate on their servers whether the stream being transmitted truly adheres to the criteria of a non-subscribed user I wonder who thought that would be a good implementation. Client-side validation seems like a very novice mistake.
It doesn't really matter if they check it or not, I had Nitro for a year during pandemic because I thought I could stream in higher quality. In reality the quality was just as bad, and sometimes video looked very pixelated. I have gigabit connection at home and a good GPU that does the encoding but I guess Discord doesn't have any servers near me (~1900km to Rotterdam) and it might be prioritizing low latency. The ex…