Live data from Hacker News

The Uncanny Sight of Waves Breaking on a Star

nautil.us

11–15 of 15 posts

Re: The Uncanny Sight of Waves Breaking on a Star

#11
post #6

Seeing that picture of a star absorbing another, I got a dumb question: Stars are balls of glowing plasma. If you were to vacuum it, as another star or black hole too close for comfort would, what would this plasma look like? I reckon it would not be visible, a bit like trying to vacuum fire. All you get is hot, invisible gas. So effectively, the image at the top of the article is completely unrealistic. Any transfer…

There are no dumb questions, only dumb answers - so here goes:

Hot things emit light. The wavelength(s) of light a substance emits depends on the temperature of that substance - cooler things emit longer (redder) wavelengths, hotter things are bluer. If the substance is cool enough, the light emitted will be mostly or wholly infra-red, therefore invisible to the naked eye but still detectable. The top of a flame is like that - the gas is still hot but no longer glowing visibly as it cools. Therefore the answer to your question depends on how hot the plasma is, but a confounding factor is that the hoovering object would create friction in the incoming material, thereby heating it up. I think the corona of a star glows with its own light (not just light emitted by the core), so I expect therefore that you would see a lot of light overall, especially nearer to whatever is doing the vacuuming.

Re: The Uncanny Sight of Waves Breaking on a Star

#12
post #6

Seeing that picture of a star absorbing another, I got a dumb question: Stars are balls of glowing plasma. If you were to vacuum it, as another star or black hole too close for comfort would, what would this plasma look like? I reckon it would not be visible, a bit like trying to vacuum fire. All you get is hot, invisible gas. So effectively, the image at the top of the article is completely unrealistic. Any transfer…

There are no dumb questions, only dumb answers - so here goes: Hot things emit light. The wavelength(s) of light a substance emits depends on the temperature of that substance - cooler things emit longer (redder) wavelengths, hotter things are bluer. If the substance is cool enough, the light emitted will be mostly or wholly infra-red, therefore invisible to the naked eye but still detectable. The top of a flame is l…

Thanks for the great answer! I didn't think of friction.

We recently got a picture of our first blackhole, time to snap a picture of a star or a blackhole slurping another star. Would be quite a sight. My Google-fu only returns artists renditions.

Re: The Uncanny Sight of Waves Breaking on a Star

#13

The description of the crests lagging the troughs made no sense to me. I have no idea what is meant. Anyone have insight?

A crashing wave where the crest leads the trough would be like when you're surfing inside of a barrel wave. The crashing part is going over your head and landing in the trough. In the case of this star simulation they are saying that the wave is crashing, but the crashing part is falling back on the back side of the wave instead of going forward over your head.

Wow, their description was awful. Yours is perfectly clear. Thanks!

Re: The Uncanny Sight of Waves Breaking on a Star

#14
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are no dumb questions, only dumb answers - so here goes: Hot things emit light. The wavelength(s) of light a substance emits depends on the temperature of that substance - cooler things emit longer (redder) wavelengths, hotter things are bluer. If the substance is cool enough, the light emitted will be mostly or wholly infra-red, therefore invisible to the naked eye but still detectable. The top of a flame is l…

Thanks for the great answer! I didn't think of friction. We recently got a picture of our first blackhole, time to snap a picture of a star or a blackhole slurping another star. Would be quite a sight. My Google-fu only returns artists renditions.

What I wouldn't give to see such a thing :-)
Post reply on HN